CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

7 395 résultats pour « Guilier »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CAA

1ère chambre - formation à 3

DCA_22NC02763_20231017

Admin. Appel

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

Délibéré après l'audience du 5 octobre 2023, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Guidi, présidente, - M. Barteaux, premier conseiller, - Mme Brodier, première conseillère.

Source officielle

Page 78 sur 370

← PrécédentSuivant →
CAA

Juge des référés

ORCA_25NC00377_20250410

Admin. Appel

10 avril 2025

10 avril 2025

La présidente de la cour administrative d'appel de Nancy a désigné Mme Guidi, présidente-assesseure, pour signer les ordonnances visées à l'article R. 222-1 du code de justice administrative.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145335

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2014

12 juin 2014

[the applicant] acknowledged her guilt in the administrative offense, but objected to the administrative removal from Russia referring to her family’s residence in Russia – a husband and an underage child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0825JUD001312687

Admin. suprême

25 août 1993

25 août 1993

The impugned provision did not refer to guilt but to continuing suspicion. The finding by a court that suspicions subsisted did not conflict with the presumption of innocence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1210DEC006555001

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2002

10 décembre 2002

’s guilt (“ Novosti News” ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD002523602

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

    The evidence relating to the relations between the applicant, S. and P.’s competing firm did not in any way prove the applicant’s guilt. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC001459015

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

objections pertaining to the use of the evidence obtained by secret surveillance and, relying in particular on that evidence, proceeded with its detailed assessment when determining the applicants’ guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC002169806

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

The conduct of the proceedings against H. and the plea bargain offered to the applicant at the beginning of his trial showed that the presiding judge had been convinced of the applicant’s guilt from the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003JUD003756897

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2002

3 octobre 2002

Accordingly, no measures amounting in effect to a finding of guilt or a penalty could be taken against a defendant without his guilt having been established beforehand at a proper trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9618

Admin. suprême

10 février 1995

10 février 1995

  Content of statements complained of Reference to applicant by high-ranking police officers, without qualification or reservation, as an accomplice to murder had been a declaration of guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4486

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2004

8 janvier 2004

The applicant challenged this order, but his detention on remand was confirmed by the District Court on the basis of strong evidence of guilt found against him and the serious risk of his re-offending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6018

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2000

25 janvier 2000

This clear admission of guilt was enough to rebut the presumption of innocence and provided sufficient justification for the Court of Appeal’s relying on this admission:   manifestly ill-founded.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3727

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2005

22 septembre 2005

It considered that the applicant’s role in the offences of smuggling and conspiracy had been “decisive”, and that his guilt had been amply proven by, among other things, the telephone calls intercepted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3650

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

Prior to the amendment of the law which had served as a legal basis for the impugned measure, demolition could only be ordered following a finding of criminal guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55732

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

In addition, the Government of the Netherlands was to pay to the applicant, ex gratia , the sum of 21   480 Dutch guilders ex VAT for legal costs incurred in the proceedings before the European Commission

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3209

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

The Hungarian court did not make any fresh assessment of the applicant’s guilt, accepted the Swedish courts’ findings and converted the sentence into ten years’ imprisonment in conformity with Hungarian

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1154

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

political climate in which the trial had taken place, the legislative reforms proposed by the Government and the applicant’s defence strategy, but did not make any pronouncements as to the applicant’s guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC005875609

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2013

1 octobre 2013

defendant in the Turkish criminal system is against the principle of equality of arms and the admission of the indictment by the court indicates the partiality of the domestic court as it has prejudged the guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205601

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2020

28 septembre 2020

In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicant’s guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141731

Admin. suprême

14 février 2014

14 février 2014

One of the arguments mentioned in the reasoning of the decision was that the simple submission of a medical certificate to the court does not prove the guilt of the defendant.

Source officielle