CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
1ère chambre - formation à 3
DCA_22NC02763_20231017
17 octobre 2023
Délibéré après l'audience du 5 octobre 2023, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Guidi, présidente, - M. Barteaux, premier conseiller, - Mme Brodier, première conseillère.
Page 78 sur 370
Juge des référés
ORCA_25NC00377_20250410
10 avril 2025
La présidente de la cour administrative d'appel de Nancy a désigné Mme Guidi, présidente-assesseure, pour signer les ordonnances visées à l'article R. 222-1 du code de justice administrative.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145335
12 juin 2014
[the applicant] acknowledged her guilt in the administrative offense, but objected to the administrative removal from Russia referring to her family’s residence in Russia – a husband and an underage child
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0825JUD001312687
25 août 1993
The impugned provision did not refer to guilt but to continuing suspicion. The finding by a court that suspicions subsisted did not conflict with the presumption of innocence.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1210DEC006555001
10 décembre 2002
’s guilt (“ Novosti News” ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD002523602
16 décembre 2008
The evidence relating to the relations between the applicant, S. and P.’s competing firm did not in any way prove the applicant’s guilt. 38.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC001459015
22 janvier 2019
objections pertaining to the use of the evidence obtained by secret surveillance and, relying in particular on that evidence, proceeded with its detailed assessment when determining the applicants’ guilt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC002169806
23 novembre 2010
The conduct of the proceedings against H. and the plea bargain offered to the applicant at the beginning of his trial showed that the presiding judge had been convinced of the applicant’s guilt from the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003JUD003756897
3 octobre 2002
Accordingly, no measures amounting in effect to a finding of guilt or a penalty could be taken against a defendant without his guilt having been established beforehand at a proper trial.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9618
10 février 1995
Content of statements complained of Reference to applicant by high-ranking police officers, without qualification or reservation, as an accomplice to murder had been a declaration of guilt.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4486
8 janvier 2004
The applicant challenged this order, but his detention on remand was confirmed by the District Court on the basis of strong evidence of guilt found against him and the serious risk of his re-offending.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6018
25 janvier 2000
This clear admission of guilt was enough to rebut the presumption of innocence and provided sufficient justification for the Court of Appeal’s relying on this admission: manifestly ill-founded.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3727
22 septembre 2005
It considered that the applicant’s role in the offences of smuggling and conspiracy had been “decisive”, and that his guilt had been amply proven by, among other things, the telephone calls intercepted
ECLI:CEDH:002-3650
8 novembre 2005
Prior to the amendment of the law which had served as a legal basis for the impugned measure, demolition could only be ordered following a finding of criminal guilt.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55732
8 octobre 1999
In addition, the Government of the Netherlands was to pay to the applicant, ex gratia , the sum of 21 480 Dutch guilders ex VAT for legal costs incurred in the proceedings before the European Commission
ECLI:CEDH:002-3209
27 juin 2006
The Hungarian court did not make any fresh assessment of the applicant’s guilt, accepted the Swedish courts’ findings and converted the sentence into ten years’ imprisonment in conformity with Hungarian
ECLI:CEDH:002-1154
8 décembre 2009
political climate in which the trial had taken place, the legislative reforms proposed by the Government and the applicant’s defence strategy, but did not make any pronouncements as to the applicant’s guilt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC005875609
1 octobre 2013
defendant in the Turkish criminal system is against the principle of equality of arms and the admission of the indictment by the court indicates the partiality of the domestic court as it has prejudged the guilt
ECLI:CEDH:001-205601
28 septembre 2020
In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicant’s guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-141731
14 février 2014
One of the arguments mentioned in the reasoning of the decision was that the simple submission of a medical certificate to the court does not prove the guilt of the defendant.