CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1109JUD006298010
9 novembre 2017
and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     62980/10 04/10/2010 Pavel Romanovich Medvedev 04/07/1976     IK-20 (УЗ 62/20) 12/03/2010 pending More
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3227690-3602765
2 septembre 2010
Four more medical reports were issued subsequently.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112354
2 juillet 2012
When weighing the freedom of expression against the protection of private life, the court found that the need to resort to criminal liability decreased when the disclosed information became more and more
ECLI:CEDH:001-112355
ECLI:CEDH:001-144052
14 avril 2014
detention order dating back more than twenty years.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD002469307
29 mars 2018
  34883/10 10/05/2010 Andrei Tomiuc 08/11/1941,   represented by Aurel Glăvan, a lawyer practising in Constanța   Constanța District Court, 29/06/2000   03/05/2005   pending More
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13518
10 décembre 2021
Thus, it appeared that the High Court had given more importance to the foster parents’ opposition to “open adoption” than to the applicant’s interest in the possibility of a continued family life with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD000340006
24 novembre 2016
year(s) and 7 month(s) and 1 day(s)     1,800     60371/14 29/08/2014 Eduard Grigoryevich PALADYAN 10/04/1955   Karpinskiy Roman Sergeyevich Moscow 27/03/2013 pending   More
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304REP002564297
4 mars 1998
Since the applicant was facing charges attracting a maximum sentence of three or more years, the application had to be served on the Attorney General.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1719956-1803362
4 juillet 2006
He had received more than 640 visits from her over a period of four years and ten months and more than 860 visits in seven years and eight months from his other lawyers.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9218
21 octobre 2013
following change in case-law after she was sentenced: violation   Facts – Between 1988 and 2000, in eight sets of criminal proceedings, the applicant received a series of prison sentences amounting to more
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-738619-750423
22 avril 2003
legal and administrative measures have been adopted which have resulted in a reduction in the occurrence of destruction of property in circumstances similar to those of the instant application and in more
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302DEC001177585
2 mars 1987
          The applicant started his work on 1 February 1982 but did not appear at his work any more after 28 April 1982.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1035397-1071177
22 juin 2004
In adoption cases, it was even more important to give the child’s interests precedence over those of its parents, as adoption meant “giving a family to a child and not the child to a family”.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145153
27 mai 2014
On 17 May 2006 the parents agreed on a court-approved contact arrangement which was implemented in a more or less regular way until the summer of 2008. 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC001971092
11 janvier 1995
    On 31 January 1991 the Ludwigshafen Aliens Office ordered the applicant to leave Germany on the ground that the applicant had been convicted of criminal offences and sentenced to more than
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0414JUD007686217
14 avril 2022
than 1 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 2 day(s)       11/05/2020-13/07/2020 Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - One appeal of detention was examined in more than
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD003242706
16 décembre 2008
The proceedings have thus lasted more than 13 years and 4 months, whereas the first decision on the merits of the case was delivered after more than 12 years and 10 months. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD004640415
16 mai 2019
Prison, which ceased on 22 March 2012 by his transfer to another prison facility in respect of which he did not raise any complaint, was lodged with the Court on 5   January   2016, that is, more
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD003606407
20 octobre 2016
    In particular, the Court observes that it took more than four and a half years before the first-instance court adopted a judgment.
Page 78 sur 7138
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.