The conviction and sentence were apparently not appealed against and became final on 4 May 1995.

Application no. 74104/01)     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG     13 September 2005       FINAL     13/12/2005       This judgment will become

de la signification du jugement à intervenir ; En tout état de cause, Débouter la BECM de l'ensemble de ses demandes, fins et conclusions à l'encontre de Monsieur [U] [W] ; Condamner BECM

She stated that she had become aware of the impugned judgment in February 2003 when she had visited the municipality. 17.

  The only issue which was in dispute between the applicant and the State Treasury was the time from which this obligation became effective.

This judgment became final on 21 December 2012. 6.

This decision became final on 21   June 2002. 4.     Fourth set of proceedings (No. Pd 354/94) 25.

    Article 327 of the Code of Criminal Procedure lists the circumstances in which “a person convicted by a judgment that has become final may be granted a retrial”.

On 28 April 1992 the High Court upheld this judgment, which thereby became final. 8.

(Application no. 66209/10)             JUDGMENT (Merits)       STRASBOURG   30 August 2016   FINAL   30/11/2016   This judgment has become

    Croatia became a member of the European Union on 1 July 2013, by virtue of Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (“Accession Treaty”).

individual by his employer for the purpose of -           (a) preventing or deterring him from being or seeking         to become

Not having been appealed, the judgment became final. The applicant, however, remained resident in Malta and retained his Maltese citizenship.

    At the same time, the applicant became aware that the apartment was occupied by M. and his family, who were internally displaced persons (“IDP”) from Lachin, a region under occupation of

That judgment became final on 17 October 1996. 5.

Monsieur [K] [G], demeurant [Adresse 21] représenté par Me Gaël SOURBE de la SCP BAUFUME ET SOURBE, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant par Me Amira GRAGUEB CHATTI etMe Jérôme COCHET de la SCP BEAM

Monsieur [F] [E], demeurant [Adresse 15] représenté par Me Emmanuelle BAUFUME de la SCP BAUFUME ET SOURBE, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant par Me Amira GRAGUEB CHATTI et Me Jérôme COCHET de la SCP BEAM

Monsieur [D] [L], demeurant [Adresse 20] représenté par Me Emmanuelle BAUFUME de la SCP BAUFUME ET SOURBE, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant par Me Amira GRAGUEB CHATTI et Me Jérôme COCHET de la SCP BEAM

Monsieur [X] [G], demeurant [Adresse 20] représenté par Me Emmanuelle BAUFUME de la SCP BAUFUME ET SOURBE, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant par Me Amira GRAGUEB CHATTI et Me Jérôme COCHET de la SCP BEAM

Monsieur [O] [T], demeurant [Adresse 20] représenté par Me Emmanuelle BAUFUME de la SCP BAUFUME ET SOURBE, avocat au barreau de LYON, plaidant par Me Amira GRAGUEB CHATTI et Me Jérôme COCHET de la SCP BEAM