Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211006
10 juin 2021
10 juin 2021
2021 SECOND SECTION Application no. 10178/18 Özgür TURAN against Turkey lodged on 25 January 2018 communicated on 10 June 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207907
11 janvier 2021
11 janvier 2021
1 February 2021 SECOND SECTION Application no. 73865/16 M.Đ. and Others against Serbia lodged on 25 November 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The present case essentially concerns the State’s alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178847
23 octobre 2017
23 octobre 2017
It further pertains to the alleged absence of procedural safeguards in place with regard to alleged procedural shortcomings at the pre-trial stage (see Türk v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC002711708
17 décembre 2013
17 décembre 2013
The alleged interference with the applicant’s right of petition 14.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-783578-800223
24 juin 2003
24 juin 2003
It also concerns the investigation into the killing of Mr Kutlu Adalı and the alleged harassment of the applicant by the authorities of the “TRNC” following the killing of her husband.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200276
12 décembre 2019
12 décembre 2019
In particular, was he abducted, as alleged, by agents of the State? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249487
2 mars 2026
2 mars 2026
The applicant’s trial followed earlier criminal proceedings against two of his alleged co ‑ conspirators, who had been convicted of several burglaries.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221886
22 novembre 2022
22 novembre 2022
ill-treatment by staff members of the Kryvyy Rig pre-trial detention centre (“the Kryvyy Rig SIZO”) during his detention there in December 2007, the alleged ineffectiveness of the subsequent investigation
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220217
27 septembre 2022
27 septembre 2022
medical malpractice and the alleged lack of a proper investigation into the matter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244397
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
42790/23), respectively, and the alleged ineffectiveness of the subsequent criminal investigations. All three applicants sustained various injuries as a result of the alleged ill-treatment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219830
11 mai 2022
11 mai 2022
no. 18939/16 Anton Volodymyrovych RUSTINOV against Ukraine lodged on 16 March 2016 communicated on 11 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The application concerns the applicant’s complaints of his alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182299
19 mars 2018
19 mars 2018
According to the applicant, the alleged failure of the court to communicate the expert report deprived him of a real opportunity to challenge the findings reached by the experts and to request a second
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157487
3 septembre 2015
3 septembre 2015
’s judgment of 3 December 2009 and the alleged judicial inconsistency.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228915
19 octobre 2023
19 octobre 2023
2023 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 34585/23 Irakli ARESHIDZE against Georgia lodged on 8 September 2023 communicated on 19 October 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205230
14 septembre 2020
14 septembre 2020
Published on 5 October 2020 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 64887/13 Sergiy Mykhaylovych ZHUK against Ukraine lodged on 30 September 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168247
4 octobre 2016
4 octobre 2016
italic } Communicated on 4 October 2016 FIRST SECTION Application no. 29309/16 Fatos PRIZRENI against Albania lodged on 16 May 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186643
6 septembre 2018
6 septembre 2018
Some of the applications, as specified in the appendix, also raise the following issues: the alleged overcrowding and poor conditions of the applicants’ detention, the alleged breach of the procedure for
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:0205DEC000552572
5 février 1973
5 février 1973
September 1971; - the alleged refusal to allow him to consult his lawyer for a period of two weeks or to receive visits from his fiancée and friends and the alleged withholding of all his outgoing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187560
8 octobre 2018
8 octobre 2018
Applications nos. 51920/10 and 61632/10 also concern the alleged lack of adequate and proper opportunity to challenge the documentary evidence against the applicants, and the alleged failure of the trial
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0824DEC001837609
24 août 2010
24 août 2010
In his defence submissions to the trial court on 12 March 1998, the applicant alleged that he was forced to sign self-incriminating statements while in police custody.
Source officiellePage 8 sur 2135