It applied where the amount which a person was ordered to pay by a confiscation order was less than the amount assessed to be the value of his proceeds of drug trafficking.

by the administrative authority, thus confirming that the latter had no discretion to fix the amount to be paid.

It awarded her compensation in the amount of PLN 30,000 with statutory interest, the total amount being PLN 60,000.

The amount of compensation must be reasonable and equitable (Article 1101).

, and also reserved the applicant’s right to bring a further action for the remaining amount that had been assessed by the expert.

of 1,800 (one thousand eight hundred) euros (EUR) jointly to Mr Ioan Jurca and Mrs Liliana Mariana Jurca; the amount of 1,800 (one thousand eight hundred) euros (EUR) to Ms Sanda Oprişa; the amount of

through its authorities, including legal expenses, 4. if the above-mentioned amount is not paid within the designated time, then from the expiry date, a simple interest on the amount shall be paid at

On 20 February 2015 she informed the applicant company that there was a deficit of funds in the amount of EUR   130,738.80, thus paid only the available amount of EUR   216,782.57 to the applicant

than the amount for compensation for unlawful detention under the applicable domestic guidelines, i.e.

Diis Group, par lettre du 11 octobre 2019, qu'ils proposeraient l'admission du capital (4 628 847,61 euros), des intérêts courus jusqu'au 22 mai 2019 inclus (29 549 euros), de l'Accreted Principal Amount

    The Federal Government is prepared to pay compensation in the amount of €1,000,000 to the Applicant if the Court, on condition of payment of that amount, strikes the Application out of the

Consequently, the bank had not breached the loan contract by its initial refusal to pay the amount in question.

It held that the base amount for pecuniary damage awarded to the applicant had been correctly calculated by the first instance-court.

On 29 December 1998 the National Water Board paid the due amount to the applicant.

The applicant company instituted proceedings against a private individual seeking payment for its services for the renovation of the respondent’s house in the amount of approximately 52,000 euros (EUR)

The administrative courts declared inadmissible his action for judicial review lodged against the relevant State authority’s decision determining that the amount of compensation for the compulsory transfer

However, the amount claimed appears excessive.

As an alternative preventive measure, it maintained her bail at the same amount.