On 15 June 1998 that judgment became final when it was upheld by the Šibenik County Court ( Županijski sud u Šibeniku ).

be appropriate for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to take the start of the six-month period from the date on which the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Keenan

While there was initial progress, concerns regarding the neglect of the children had become so serious that on 22 October 2019 the children’s judge issued orders to place the children into care ( uithuisplaatsing

As a result, they became liable to pay secondary-school fees from which they would have been exempt had they been in possession of a permanent-residence permit.

    After the applicant had become the owner of the flat in 1994, he became entitled to participate in the administrative proceedings concerning the eviction of Z.G. (see § 11 above).

The judgment of 3 October 2003 providing for monthly payments was not appealed against and thus became binding on 14 October 2003.

The county court held that the limitation term had started to run from the date of the accident, when the claimants became aware that C.A. was guilty for the accident and about the damages incurred by

the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Beck,   Copp   and   Bazeley delivered on 22 October 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

    In the case of Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

In the absence of stabilisation in the present case, given that it was a progressive chronic illness, the action for damages had not therefore become time-barred.

    In the case of Demir (citied above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8;   -   held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the first applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment became

No appeals were lodged against that judgment and, pursuant to the domestic law, it became final and enforceable within one month of its delivery.

Since the first applicant remained unable to pay, its gambling licences were revoked in two decisions of the Commission of 22   June 2020 (one of which became final on 29 July 2022).

From that perspective, the right to ask for enforcement became time-barred on 2 December 2014.

#Österreichische Unilever GmbH przeciwko Smithkline Beecham Markenartikel GmbH.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: Handelsgericht Wien - Austria.#Sprawa C-77/97.

However, special considerations could apply in exceptional cases where applicants availed themself of or relied on an apparently existing remedy and only subsequently became aware of circumstances which

At the same time, he applied to start serving his sentence before the first-instance judgment had become final.

After the conclusion of the proceedings at the domestic level, at an unspecified time, the applicant company became aware of the minutes of the Judicial Administration’s meeting of 14 October 2019.