Administrative proceedings a) Request of 1985 In 1985 the applicant requested the Cologne Health Insurance Association ( Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege ) to establish that

padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747

47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;        Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS       

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated the lawyer who would represent him, Mr L.J.L. Heukels (Rule 31). 4.

    In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule   33 §   3 (d) of Rules   of Court   A, the applicants stated that they wished to take part in the proceedings

  As to the existence of an agreement Court finds that there had been no “agreement” for the purposes of Rule 54 § 4 of Rules of Court A.

:#ff0000 } .s6CCEAD68 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207

On 16   May 2000 the Chamber constituted to examine the case decided to hold an oral hearing on the admissibility and merits of the case (Rule 54 § 4 of the Rules of Court).

    In the following, the composition of the Fifth Section sitting on 4 September 2012 was modified in accordance with Rule 25 § 4 of the Rules of Court. THE FACTS 8.

and designated the lawyers who would represent it (Rule   30). 3.

  On 9 November 1973 the Cologne Court of Appeal quashed the Regional Court's decision of 8 June 1973 and sent the case back for re-examination by the Regional Court.

        On 12 February 1993 the Cologne Court of Appeal (Oberlandes- gericht) dismissed the applicant's appeal.

    The applicant moved from Santa Coloma de Gramanet, Catalonia, to Ciudad Real, in Castilla La Mancha, on 17 September 2014. The administrative proceedings 9.

the lawyer who would represent them (Rule   31).

and designated the lawyer who would represent them (Rule   31).

Conclusion : no need to rule on the complaint (unanimously). IiI.

    On 13 November 1987 the Cologne Court of Appeal ( Oberlandesgericht ), upon the applicant’s appeal on points of law ( Revision ), quashed the judgment of 13 February 1987 and sent the case

    The applications were allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

Voicu (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 5). 4.