CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

186 résultats pour « Hervé BRUCK »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD000274212

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

On that occasion A.Pi. mentioned the applicant as her contact in the Fund. She also stated that everybody should make out well in this business undertaking.

Page 8 sur 10

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0625JUD003693202

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2009

25 juin 2009

    The Russian Constitution of 12 December 1993 establishes that a judicial decision is required before a defendant can be detained or his or her detention extended (Article 22).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124JUD002978703

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2008

24 janvier 2008

Bracke , Attaché, Head of Department, Border Inspection Department, Aliens Office, Federal Department of the Interior, Ms   T.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD003694102

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2009

23 avril 2009

    The Russian Constitution of 12 December 1993 establishes that a judicial decision is required before a defendant can be detained or his or her detention extended (Article 22).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000719304

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2016

17 mars 2016

    The applicant’s sister complained to the Governor of Kharkiv SIZO about the conditions of her brother’s detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0311JUD004234698

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2004

11 mars 2004

    The central heating pipes in cells for special regime prisoners were covered by a layer of bricks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC003849405

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

The cell was dirty, toilet was clogged and bricks covered the windows leaving only a small hole for air. The applicant was placed there with sixteen other detainees. The cell was not properly lit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD000170406

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

As to the toilet, it consisted of a hole in the ground and two cemented bricks for placing the feet. There was no sink, and the water tap was set just above the toilet hole.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000822578

Admin. suprême

28 mai 1985

28 mai 1985

For these reasons, Lord Justice Bridge, with whom Lords Justice Cumming-Bruce and Brightman concurred, was in favour of dismissing the appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD000426506

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2012

23 octobre 2012

The toilet was located in the corner of the cell near the entrance door and was separated from the living area of the cell by a brick wall which was one metre high and ensured the privacy of the person

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD004631108

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2020

10 septembre 2020

The prosecutor noted that company K. decreased the width of the wall near the applicants’ balcony by half a brick width; M. could not reconstruct the premises without the approved project, while it was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD000157207

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

Some of them told the second applicant that her three sons were being kept inside the poultry ‑ house. The second applicant waited for her sons' release for the next three days. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD004035511

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

I.B. also saw the villagers chasing his sons and attacking them with stones, bats and bricks. 9 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003250111

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

A., who stated that her husband had been abducted by law-enforcement agents and whose statement was similar to the one given by Mr Ya. S. on 1   June 2011. 62.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD002064104

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

    The Russian Constitution of 12 December 1993 establishes that a judicial decision is required before a defendant can be detained or his or her detention extended (Article 22). 55.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD003400002

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

The pan was separated from the living area by a one ‑ metre ‑ high brick wall. Inmates were allowed to take a shower once a week.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116DEC004881799

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2004

16 novembre 2004

    The Constitution and the Constitutional Court's practice Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC002201810

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

    The applicant and his fellow detainees were allowed twenty minutes of daily outdoor exercise, which took place in a small yard measuring 6x4   m, surrounded by a brick wall.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0430JUD003785808

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2014

30 avril 2014

It was separated from the living area of the cell by a brick or metal screen 1.75 or 1.65 m high which ensured privacy. The distance between the toilet and the dining table was at least 1.5 metres.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD004184112

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

Only the accused or his or her lawyer, and the public prosecutor, have the right to challenge jurors; the civil party may not do so.

Source officielle