The judgment recalled that the applicant had been questioned at the hearing; that his lawyer had been able to make comments; that the applicant had been given the final word; and that the applicant's lawyer

I would like to be able to tell you what other figures have been given in the recent past in similar cases, but I can’t do that and I mustn’t do that.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

seriousness, cohesion and significance need to be met as those that apply to ‘religion’, and these conditions have not been met.

The search warrant must be issued in writing and be justified.

You will see yourself how I look like and that is sad. Maybe you will consider this action a sign of weakness, but this is what I have been afraid of the most.

Truly not because I like you cause it's human nature to like you but to allow my feeling to get the better of me, er you, one should usually be more controlled that that.

Paternity action could not be instituted in respect of a child whose legal parentage had already been established.

brought had not been identified”.

Passage headed "Be yourself" (p. 77): "Maybe you smoke pot or go to bed with your boyfriend or girlfriend - and don't tell your parents or teachers, either because you don't dare to or just because you

s2E50B6C1 { width:27.96pt; display:inline-block } .sF81636D0 { width:220.36pt; display:inline-block } CINQUIÈME SECTION DÉCISION PARTIELLE SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ de la requête n o 26890/03 présentée par Yosif

        The facts of the case as they have been submitted by the applicants may be summarised as follows:         The individual applicants fled

Mr and Mrs H. also have a third daughter, born on 3 September 1997 (whose name has not been communicated and who will hereinafter be referred to as “X”).

X. pleaded not guilty to the charges and was convicted, he would be sentenced to a very long term of imprisonment, but if he pleaded guilty, there would be a substantial reduction.

You will be extradited to Belgium. On 20 October 1999, you have been heard by the German police. On 17 April 2001, you have been heard by the Belgian authorities.

The applicant accepted that confiscation might be justified in cases where the object of an offence had been acquired unlawfully or was prohibited, such as weapons, drugs or endangered species.

  Above the line to be signed by the person being searched appeared the following: “I have read this notice (or it has been read to me) and I understand it.

She would be better off living in Tashkent where her mother was buried and where most of her family and friends lived.

There is some lack of clarity around some of the risk factors in your case, and you yourself recognise that there is more to be done in terms of addressing risk ...” 16 .

Had this been known, he would not have been granted asylum.