On 29 March 2007 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died, and asked to strike the application out of the list of cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and to strike the application out of the list of cases.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

The Government invited the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Moreover, she has failed to respond to a registered letter dated 8 June 2007, warning her of the possibility that her case might be struck out of the Court’s list if she did not reply.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

In a letter of 31 August 2007 the applicant confirmed that she had no objection to the present application being struck out of the Court’s list of cases.

The Court may at any stage of the proceedings decide to strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that (a) the applicant does not intend to pursue his

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

It follows that it should be struck out of the list of cases under Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

In a letter of 12 July 2007, the Government commented that they saw no reason for maintaining the proceedings and likewise requested that the case be struck out.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.