In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos.

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.

    In the leading case of Foundation Hostel for Students of the Reformed Church and Stanomirescu v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, 9   November 2010; Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, 20 February 2014; and Isayeva v.

R.J. had died intestate, leaving behind a daughter. Had his paternity of the applicant been legally confirmed, both daughters would have inherited an equal share of the estate. 2.

    In the leading case of Pavlík v. Slovakia (no. 74827/01, 30 April 2007) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 18.

    In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28   March 2006 and Sukachov v.

    In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia , no. 74568/12, 5 January 2016, Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v.

    In the leading case of Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR   2006‑V, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 15.

In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v. Russia, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 12.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, 10   February 2011) and Ignatov v.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    The circumstances leading to a friendly settlement in application no. 127/05 5.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

As for costs and expenses, the applicants requested the Court to make an award for the work conducted by their lawyers in the present case, leaving the amount to be determined by the Court. 21.

    In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v.