CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115DEC000317207

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2013

15 janvier 2013

no. 3172/07 Simeon LUKAREV against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 15   January 2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle

Page 81 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD003197411

Admin. suprême

27 février 2014

27 février 2014

    The applicants were represented by Mr   B. Rybak, a lawyer practising in Kazan. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1009JUD003787304

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2014

9 octobre 2014

It does not appear that such rules were issued until 15 January 2007 (see paragraph 31 below). 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD004719106

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2014

2 octobre 2014

    The Court observes that the grounds for refusing the registration of the applicant group were not consistent throughout the time the applicants were attempting to obtain registration (compare

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD001210205

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2013

4 avril 2013

On 27   April 2006 the applicant’s allegations were dismissed. 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0619JUD001244004

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2014

19 juin 2014

    On 3 November 2005 new regulations were adopted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC001787306

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

During hearings on 17 and 18 March and 10 April 2008 ambulances were called to provide the applicant with urgent medical assistance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD002984304

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2010

2 décembre 2010

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD002332109

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD001638607

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2010

16 septembre 2010

After a reminder of the Social Court of Appeal on 15   August 2006 these observations were submitted on 20 December 2006. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1013JUD000899207

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2011

13 octobre 2011

    The applicants were represented by Mr P. Zima, a lawyer practising in Prague. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD001593506

Admin. suprême

17 février 2011

17 février 2011

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623DEC001925613

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2015

23 juin 2015

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD002999205

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2013

18 avril 2013

The Court considers that these provisions were not, in themselves, incompatible with the fair trial guarantees of Article 6 § 1. 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003977807

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

The applicant's challenges for bias against two judges were unsuccessful, as were his appeals for the right to be heard against these decisions. 39.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC004093905

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2010

1 juin 2010

On the same day criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant and some other persons in respect of the robbery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD000031607

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526DEC003412903

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

Ensuing attempts by the applicant company to obtain the reopening of the proceedings were unsuccessful. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0315DEC004219504

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2011

15 mars 2011

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Y.   Zaytsev. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC000870204

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

The judgments were not appealed against. 5.

Source officielle