During his incarceration he was placed in four different cells where he had between three and just over seven square metres of personal space.

did not give clear characteristics of the assembly; b) the notice was not sent in reasonable time (dated 11 August 2012 and received by Kharkiv City Council on 13 August 2012, while the assembly was planned

On 20 November 2013 the Cherkasy Regional Court of Appeal ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention and he was placed in the Cherkasy Pre-trial Detention Centre (“the SIZO”).

On 22 February 2020 he was placed in pre-trial detention in Odesa Pre-Trial Detention Facility where, according to him, he was not receiving adequate medical treatment and his state of health deteriorated

the Czech Republic lodged on 26 February 2016 communicated on 28 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the enrolment of the applicant, who is a Roma born in 1978 and who was placed

0pt; margin-bottom:36pt } .s9296A950 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } FOURTH SECTION Applications nos 18938/07 and 36069/09 Plamen

The demonstration was being organised by a non-governmental organisation which aimed to protect citizens’ rights in town planning and was to protest in particular against the planned construction of a

The second applicant was placed in Plateias Dimokratias police station on three occasions between 30 th May 2013 and 3 rd June 2013, each time for more than three hours.

On 24 May 2018 the Guardianship Commission of Madrid declared the applicant’s three older children in a situation of abandonment ( desamparo ) and placed them under the provisional guardianship ( tutela

In April 2005, having been charged with arson by the Greek authorities, he was placed in detention pending extradition by the Italian police pursuant to an arrest warrant issued under the European Convention

text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 2329/13 Plamen

25.10.2022 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Applicants’ conviction decisively based on confession by accomplice, who was not prompted by any deal, but was later placed

After the mother’s death, the two children concerned by the adoption procedure were placed with professional childcare assistants and the third child (born in June 2012), was placed in special care as

In April 1993 the applicant was arrested in Luxembourg and extradited to Belgium, where he was placed in detention.

Article 9-1 Manifest religion or belief Refusal to grant applicant leave from house arrest to attend Mass: no violation Facts – The applicant, who had previously been in custody awaiting trial, was placed

Effective remedy No effective remedy to discover the identity of the author of a defamatory text posted on the Internet in the name of a minor: admissible   In 1999 an unknown person or persons placed

From 4 December 2018 until 30 May 2019, the applicant was held in pre-trial detention, and from 31 May 2019 until 21 December 2020 he was placed under house arrest.

On 5 April 2008 Mr Vasilyev’s detention was authorised by a court and he was placed in remand prison IZ-72/1 of the Tyumen Region of Russia.