Decision of the Court   In its judgment, the first concerning Monaco, the Court reached the following conclusions.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

Afterwards, monthly visits were allowed; however, the applicant complained that during the visits of his mother, who had hearing difficulties, they had been separated by a glass panel and had to use an

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

Aleksandrovich PETROV against Russia lodged on 15 February 2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicant, Mr Pavel Aleksandrovich Petrov, is a Russian national who was born in 1993 and lives in Cheboksary

However, the public prosecutor's office, which was required by law to refer the matter to a panel of specialists from the Institute of Forensic Medicine, had waited some twenty days before doing so.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

Patrice Albert X... C/ Mme Olga Y..., Mme Yolande X..., SARL JPC Société en liquidation amiable, représentée par Monsieur Jean-Paul Z...

: 20 Février 2026 N° RG 26/00197 - N° Portalis DBW3-W-B7K-7LX4 PARTIES : DEMANDEUR Monsieur [U] [E] Né le [Date naissance 1] 1947 à [Localité 1] demeurant [Adresse 1] Représenté par Maître Patrice

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

of the 1973 Act required, unconditionally and unreservedly, that such persons provided evidence of their innocence left a doubt with regard to their innocence and   the merits of the decisions reached

It considered that the onus was on the Government to provide a plausible explanation as to how they had reached the media and that they had not done so.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general