time of communication of the present application, the Court considered that, in the consequent absence of a separate decision on admissibility, it retained jurisdiction under Article   38, as it read

    Did the applicant’s daughter suffer discrimination on the ground of her sex, contrary to Article 14 read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, in relation to the manner

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his trade union membership, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction

exceptional circumstances justifying [the children]’s separation from their mother” amount to discrimination against the applicant on grounds of sex, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   8?

The applicants complain about uncompensated and discriminatory expropriation, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention.

  14681/09, 45691/09 and 47954/09 – suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention

Was the appeal decision read out in full on 28 July 2015 in the presence of the defence? When was the text of the appeal decision finalised and made available to the defence?   2.

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his linguistic identity contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction

application lodged on 9 December 1992 by Ms Juliet Cicely, Ms Nicola Rosalind Varley, Mr John Cromwell Varley, Ms Joan Elizabeth Hartill, Mr Edwin Gentry Pitts, Mr Allan Steward Pitts and Ms Rosalind Edith Read

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 (see for example Biao v.

the authorities’ alleged failure to conduct an effective investigation, have the applicants suffered discrimination on the ground of their sexual orientation contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read

    Did the applicant’s legal representative agree to have the statements made by B.K., Bu.K., and E.K at the investigation stage read out at the trial?

The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   13 read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about a lack of access to a court.

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her rights, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 and/or Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention as a result of the alleged failure of the authorities to investigate the existence

    Has the applicant foundation suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of its right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with

A..., représenté par Me Rezaie Yazdi, demande à la juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d’annuler le deuxième procès-verbal

I have read everything to which my attention has been drawn.” 28 .

  Moreover, he is not able to read papers to the same extent as he did before.