FINANCEMENT agissant poursuites et diligences de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège : [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Jean-michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

A B, représenté par la société d'avocats Louit-Dutel et associés, demande au tribunal : 1°) à titre principal, de prononcer la décharge, en droits et pénalités, des cotisations supplémentaires d'impôt

    On 4 July 2003 the Russian Government adopted a Decree laying down the procedure for payment of compensation to citizens who had lost their housing or property situated on the territory of

letters of 2 August 2001 the central office and the Georgiyevsk branch of the Savings Bank informed the applicant that as a result of the events in the Chechen Republic, the Chechen Savings Bank had lost

    The applicant complained that the domestic courts had failed to assess the facts correctly, had misinterpreted the domestic law, had lost his file and had not been impartial.

  The court refused the application finding that since A. had been with her foster-parents for three years and lost all memory of the applicant, it was in her best interests for A. to remain with

    In the meantime, on 14 January 2004 the Bailiffs informed the applicant that the writ of execution in respect of the judgment of 6   December 1999 had been lost and advised her to request

On 4 February 2002 the applicants’ representative sent a letter informing the Registry that she had lost contact with the applicants and that she did not know in which prison they were currently detained

The applicant had only lost certain privileges that had been formerly granted to him as a military officer of a state that does no longer exist.

He argued that these actions had retrospectively lost all justification given that the charges had been dropped.

It struck a balance between the interests of those whose property had been confiscated without compensation in the past and the persons who had lost cases brought against them under section 7 of the Restitution

    In the meantime, the court had lost part of the case-file. For that reason, the hearing listed for 10   July   1998 was cancelled.

Furthermore, Mr Siemianowski had not lost all access to the child and therefore emotional ties had not been destroyed.

    He further complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the outcome of the proceedings in that he lost the case and did not receive any compensation. 3.

The violation complained of had, therefore, been remedied at the domestic level and, as a result, the applicant company had lost its victim status. 25.

Eventually, in August 2007 a further investigation was ordered, but it appears that no action was taken as the case file was lost (see paragraphs 11-13 above).

    In the present case, the applicant also “lost” a judgment favourable to him.

    The material concerning the applicant’s complaint was subsequently lost. 22.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had lost his victim status as a result of the domestic courts’ rulings in the proceedings initiated by him under Law No. 87. 15.

    The Government argued next that the applicant company did not calculate correctly the tax to be deduced from the alleged lost profit and did not deduce tax from the default interest calculated