CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD003569211

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2012

31 juillet 2012

The circumstances underlying [the authorities’ decision] to remand the applicant in custody have not ceased to exist.

Page 87 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0411JUD002667606

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2013

11 avril 2013

At the same time, bearing in mind that the parties to the criminal proceedings have already started studying the case file, the extension asked for by the prosecution appears to be excessive and must be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD005326108

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The Constitutional Court therefore holds that that the proceedings which preceded those before the Constitutional Court were conducted in a manner which enabled the complainant to have a fair hearing and

Source officielle
CA

12e chambre

5fca56fdfa41e51ef42e2182

Appel

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur François THOMAS, Président, Mme Véronique MULLER, Conseiller, Monsieur Patrice DUSAUSOY, Conseiller, Greffier, lors des débats : Monsieur Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0223JUD004631799

Admin. suprême

23 février 2006

23 février 2006

    Dr E.B. concluded that the injuries described could have been sustained in a two ‑ stage fall. 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD004587206

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

He should therefore have raised it before the Court within six months from 13 December 2003, the date on which the blood sample was taken. 75. The applicant disagreed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0408JUD000037702

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2010

8 avril 2010

Article   13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1803702-1898243

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2006

6 octobre 2006

Their heirs have informed the European Court of Human Rights that they wish to pursue the proceedings before it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD000823503

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

Russia , The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD001188422

Admin. suprême

11 février 2025

11 février 2025

It is recalled that only Russian official information sources have reliable and up-to-date information.” 4.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1822687-3862636

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

  Lastly, the Court could not speculate as to what the outcome of the proceedings might have been had they complied with the requirements of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228449

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial two police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based     5701/22 20/01/2022 Aleksandra

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD005611112

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000627706

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   András Sajó, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC006223509

Admin. suprême

27 août 2013

27 août 2013

    Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1222JUD005885800

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2009

22 décembre 2009

In such cases, the compensation is equivalent to the amount of compensation that would have been payable on a formal expropriation in the most favourable scenario for the owner, plus 10 %. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC000426106

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

Superficial wounds and abrasions on the wrists could have been sustained as a result of ... rubbing of handcuffs.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD006635714

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2017

13 avril 2017

It ordered that a list of the file’s contents be made and that the applicant have access to documents he could specify in terms of their form, content, date and origin. 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD004154506

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

    The Court accepts that the applicant’s detention may initially have been warranted by a reasonable suspicion that he had been involved in fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD002161307

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

The applicant filed two motions to have the hearing adjourned in order to have sufficient time to prepare his defence, but the Justice of the Peace noted the insignificant volume of the case file (five

Source officielle