On 9 July 2003 the Kyiv City Court of Appeal upheld this judgment and it became final. 8.

No remedy had been exercised against decision no. 86/2007 which became final. Proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court 10 .

He claimed that, unlike them, he could not become employed part-time and keep receiving his long-term service pension.

In those circumstances, the proceedings concerning the construction permit had become devoid of purpose. The applicants appealed.

This judgment became binding on 5   October 2000 but was not enforced immediately. 6.

Consequently, the Appeal Court judgment became final on 6   June 2006. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

Apparently, the applicant missed the statutory time-limit for appeal and the detention order became final. On 6 April 2006 the District Court extended the applicant’s detention until 10 June 2006.

The judgment became final in the absence of an appeal. 5.

vrchní soud ) confirmed that the applicant’s sterilisation was illegal and that the hospital’s obligation was to apologise to the applicant, but found that the applicant’s right to compensation had become

The contract was authenticated by a notary on 23   February 1995 and was registered with the Bureau of Technical Inventory (which later became known as the Territorial Cadastral Office (“the TCO”)

In 1991, after Slovenia became an independent state, the applicant did not obtain Slovenian citizenship because, as he claims, he lived in a bachelor's home and did not, therefore, satisfy the statutory

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the quashing by way of allegedly abusive revision proceedings of a final judgment in favour of the applicant company more than ten years after it became

In 2012 the applicant’s father died and his disabled mother became fully dependent on him. On 18 February 2015 the applicant and Ms A.D. registered their marriage officially.

The confiscations became final with judgments no. 48525 of 28 November 2019 and no.   14846 of 13   May 2020 respectively. As regards application no. 6411/21 Esposito and Cosimo v.

submitted in that connection that the Supreme Administrative Court had held in other cases brought by assistant auditors that the salary difference would be calculated from the date when their advancement became

The decision became final on 19 December 2006 and was finally executed on 5 December 2012. COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

A..., représenté par la SELARL Becam-Moncalis, avocat, demande au juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) de suspendre

A..., représenté par la SELARL Becam-Moncalis, avocat, demande au juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) de suspendre

The decision became final on 29 September 2008 before the Bucharest Court of Appeal, following unsuccessful appeals by the applicant.

The applicant’s request for rectification of the decision was subsequently rejected and the decision became final on 25 October 2005. 9.