Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000952002
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115076
6 novembre 2012
6 novembre 2012
On 23 September 2008 the applicant company appealed against the decision claiming, inter alia , that its right under Article 8 of the Convention had been violated because there had been no
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113175
30 août 2012
30 août 2012
By the letter of 24 July 2002 the Justice Department informed the applicant association that the judgment in its favour could not be enforced because an appeal against it was pending. 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC005005306
2 juin 2020
2 juin 2020
The court made the award payable immediately because of its significance to the applicant and in view of ever-rising consumer prices.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148779
19 novembre 2014
19 novembre 2014
The applicant further complained relying on Article 18 of the Convention that he had been deprived of his liberty because of his activity as a human rights activist.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164070
26 mai 2016
26 mai 2016
I signed that record because I did not know what was going on, I did not know what I was signing and I did not read what had been written.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001531202
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because she had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC003897197
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
zone of Ayios Stephanos (Monte Smith) and because the expropriation of their share had not been completed within the time-limit provided for in domestic law.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD003364507
20 janvier 2011
20 janvier 2011
In the course of the proceedings the hearings were adjourned once because of the applicant’s failure to appear, once on his request because of his illness, eight times because of the failure
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005DEC003126602
5 octobre 2006
5 octobre 2006
The following hearing, listed for 16 May 2000, was adjourned because the new judge participated in other unrelated proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714DEC001204986
14 juillet 1988
14 juillet 1988
As of 1 February 1982, the applicant's guardian let the house on lease because it needed renovation. Shortly before that date, the last tenants had left the house.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173638
26 avril 2017
26 avril 2017
Because those people will serve petty political – but mostly their own personal – interests much more readily in order to impose themselves more easily than others, others whose vote they wormed out by
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000950402
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because she had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000951402
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000972002
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Varaždin Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC001733805
10 mai 2007
10 mai 2007
The Court considers that it does not have to answer the question of exhaustion of domestic remedies because the application is anyhow inadmissible for the following reasons.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0315DEC005053099
15 mars 2001
15 mars 2001
Between September 1993 and June 1994 the applicants were dismissed from their posts because the American base where they used to work closed down.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0304DEC001152385
4 mars 1987
4 mars 1987
This letter was stopped because it contained unventilated complaints.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC003888502
23 septembre 2003
23 septembre 2003
of his work in DSP and for Mobutu, because of his Ngbandi ethnicity and because of his close connections with the family of Mobutu.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD003520703
13 septembre 2005
13 septembre 2005
Because of the lack of medication he had to endure the attacks and wait for them to pass, being obliged to sit in a vertical position. His attacks became more frequent and started to last longer.
Source officiellePage 87 sur 1597