She also lost the right to medical insurance she previously had held. At 65 years of age and not in the best of health, the applicant decided to remain in Rome.

  Ukraine (nos. 58812/15 and 4 others, § 333, 17   October 2019), where, at the time the judgment was delivered, the applicants’ claims for reinstatement and lost wages had been pending before

  Thousands of people allegedly lost their money in such transactions.

In fact, it recalls that compensation must be calculated based on the property’s value on the date on which its ownership was lost, which is intrinsically linked to the designation of the land at that

It struck a balance between the interests of those whose property had been confiscated without compensation in the past and the persons who had lost cases brought against them under section 7 of the Restitution

    The Government alleged that the second applicant’s case should be considered under Article 3 of the Convention, and not under Article 2, as he had not lost his life during the events and

On 24 December 2002 the District Court found that the impugned order had lost its validity on 27 February 2002, when the Court of Appeal quashed the judgment on the basis of which it had been issued.

It struck a balance between the interests of those whose property had been confiscated without compensation in the past and the persons who had lost cases brought against them under section 7 of the Restitution

After the surgery, the applicant lost the sight in his left eye.

Once the court had resolved this preliminary issue, it went on to conclude that, since the applicant and her husband had lost their tenancy, they had not satisfied the most important statutory requirement

    COMPLAINTS         The applicants complain under Article 2 of the Convention that their right to life was breached in that they lost an entitlement to the medical

Having lost the action, he missed the time-limit to lodge an appeal statement.

Within ten minutes of the end of the interview, the applicant apologised to the listeners, accepting that he did not hold it together, that he had been unprofessional and that he had “lost his rag”.

The violation complained of had, therefore, been remedied before the domestic authorities and, as a result, the applicant had lost her victim status. 24.

They argued, in particular, that they lost a job that they had legitimately obtained, including the salary, notwithstanding that they had successfully completed the competition and had undergone a costly

The applicants maintained that the authorities had failed to act properly and professionally, and because of their actions the applicants had lost the possibility to require damages from those who were

    The Government submitted that the applicant had lost her victim status as a result of being compensated in the civil proceedings.

They told me that they would take me to Gölbaşı and that I would get lost there. They also told me that they would not kill me immediately because they wanted me first to suffer. It was getting dark.

constituted sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage which the applicants might have suffered: the protracted nature of the proceedings had benefited the applicants, as key evidence had been lost

    The Government further submitted that the applicant had lost his victim status as a result of the courts’ findings and the award made in the impugned proceedings. 13 .