However, the doctor considered that the applicant’s chronic lower back pain did not serve as a reason for him to have a mattress.

Ya. should have been in that office, since [Ya. and K.] worked together...

The investigator’s attempts to arrange for a confrontation within a reasonable time and on the premises of the Investigating Committee have been unsuccessful. 46.

    On 15 April 2008 the investigator applied to the court to have the applicant’s detention extended.

Those arguments have been confirmed. The court came to this conclusion for the following reasons.

Prison officers took some detainees out of their cells to have them tested for alcohol intoxication...

They were therefore presumed to have close emotional links to this part of the family. This was also where they had their friends and social network.

On an unspecified date the applicant handed over his allegedly defective dental prosthesis to his lawyer, apparently, to have this prosthesis adjusted.

Their major argument was that if the applicant had been beaten or ill-treated, other convicts would have learnt of it, and that would represent a serious security issue, maybe even cause a riot.

between the applicant and his son that could have reasonably been expected of them.

No other visual injuries ... have been discovered.” 14.

The President of the Chamber acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 2.

When Alexandros Kafkas left to go on a trip, Nikolaos reconverted to the Pentecostal Church.

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 21 Juin 2022, en audience publique, devant la Cour composée de : Mme Marie-Ange SENTUCQ, présidente de chambre Mme Valérie MORLET, conseillère Mme Alexandra

  The Government pointed out that, according to the Convention institutions' case-law and Italian law, the principle that laws should not have retrospective effect was not absolute.

The first applicant alleged that S.Z. might have disclosed confidential information to Alpenews and asked for the alleged leak to be investigated.

    The general principles concerning the conditions of detention are well established in the Court’s case-law and have been summarised as follows (see Ananyev and Others v.

    The applicants have not seen the two brothers since that date. 2.     Official investigation 72.

The Court may, however, have regard to facts prior to ratification inasmuch as they could be considered to have created a situation extending beyond that date or may be relevant for the understanding of