The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

At least 13 people were killed and others were injured by stray bullets. ...

Former prisoners reported that medical check-ups were rare and conducted by under-qualified medical personnel and that examination results were often fabricated.

Their answers were provided to the applicants, who were given the opportunity to comment on them. THE FACTS 11 .

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.

    Subsequently, several more hearings were scheduled, but none were conducted due to the deteriorating medical condition of the applicant. 13.

    Within the framework of the campaign, more than 4,000 declarations were handed to the authorities in Berlin; approximately 100,000 declarations were submitted to German administration as

It then concluded that the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment were unfounded and unsupported by any evidence.

Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of ‘public watchdog’.

    The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.

    The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.     On 27 August 2009 the application was communicated to the Government.

    The applicants were represented by Mrs S. Kutlay, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

    The applicant companies were represented by Mr T. Hatland, a lawyer practising in Bergen. The Norwegian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mrs F.

    The applicants were represented by Mr R. Martynovskiy, a lawyer practising in Sevastopol. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y.

On 10 October 1995 the proceedings were terminated for lack of evidence. 7.

Moreover, there were strong incentives for the applicant to abscond if released.

They were represented before the Court by Mr W.L. Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz, Austria. A.