CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56330
24 juin 2002
Court of Human Rights in the 34 cases details of which appear in the Appendix to this resolution, which were delivered on 18 September 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145427
10 juin 2014
This judgment became final.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC003914809
27 septembre 2011
On 13 March 2002 the Adana Assize Court dismissed the case, indicating that the applicant could not bring compensation proceedings under Law no. 466 before the judgment concerning her acquittal became
ECLI:CEDH:001-120082
30 avril 2013
The judgment became final. On 29 August 2003 the pension fund informed the applicant about the payment of arrears.
ECLI:CEDH:001-56338
6 janvier 2004
judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 5 cases, details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered on 23 May 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69973
18 juillet 2005
details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered between 22   October   2002 and 27   July   2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-169418
7 novembre 2016
    Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice governing the cassation review of judicial decisions after they become final in force as of 1   January 2012
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13222
13 avril 2021
In any event, applicants had to ensure that their claims were raised before the Court with the necessary expedition once it became clear that there was no realistic prospect of a favourable outcome in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1122DEC000407918
22 novembre 2022
    The Supreme Court delivered its decision containing full reasoning on 7 July 2017 and it became available in the Supreme Court’s registry and on its website. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC004564818
30 janvier 2024
The Sisak Municipal Court dismissed their action by a judgment of 4 December 2007, holding that the applicants’ claim had become time‑barred (see, mutatis mutandis , Trivkanović (no. 2) , cited above,
ECLI:CEDH:001-169045
2 novembre 2016
Since none of the parties appealed, the decision became final on 28   November 2011. The applicant did not take part in these proceedings and was not informed about them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC001978207
22 mai 2012
On 1 July 2005 the above judgment became final but remains unenforced.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516DEC005308611
16 mai 2017
In this regard, the Government submitted several judgments of the Court of Cassation where this court emphasised that there was no need to wait for the proceedings to become final in order to decide on
ECLI:CEDH:001-108131
2 décembre 2011
execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-193671
16 mai 2019
It found that there was no dispute that the applicant had become the owner in a lawful manner ( na zakonit način ) pursuant to the sales contract concluded in 1980.
ECLI:CEDH:001-147363
22 septembre 2014
Meanwhile his arm became swollen and in the morning when they returned to their regiment, the applicant was suffering and hardly able to walk.
ECLI:CEDH:001-156295
23 juin 2015
Note: I have just become aware of this matter through rumours within the military of the mentioned post, who claim that they have not reported the situation for fear of reprisals, and because of that [
ECLI:CEDH:002-12991
10 novembre 2020
In October 2000 the tax authorities issued it with a summons to pay, expressly stating that the purpose of the summons was to interrupt the period before the tax debt became time-barred.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2917
18 janvier 2007
According to Article   357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the judgment had not become final as his appeal was still pending.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0830DEC003596802
30 août 2007
Bearing in mind the Court’s case-law which states that the six month period runs from the date on which the applicant’s lawyer become aware of the domestic remedies, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant
Page 89 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.