CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56330

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2002

24 juin 2002

Court of Human Rights in the 34 cases details of which appear in the Appendix to this resolution, which were delivered on 18 September 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145427

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2014

10 juin 2014

This judgment became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC003914809

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

On 13 March 2002 the Adana Assize Court dismissed the case, indicating that the applicant could not bring compensation proceedings under Law no. 466 before the judgment concerning her acquittal became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120082

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

The judgment became final. On 29 August 2003 the pension fund informed the applicant about the payment of arrears.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56338

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2004

6 janvier 2004

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 5 cases, details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered on 23 May 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69973

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2005

18 juillet 2005

details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered between 22   October   2002 and 27   July   2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169418

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2016

7 novembre 2016

    Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice governing the cassation review of judicial decisions after they become final in force as of 1   January 2012

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13222

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2021

13 avril 2021

In any event, applicants had to ensure that their claims were raised before the Court with the necessary expedition once it became clear that there was no realistic prospect of a favourable outcome in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1122DEC000407918

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2022

22 novembre 2022

    The Supreme Court delivered its decision containing full reasoning on 7 July 2017 and it became available in the Supreme Court’s registry and on its website. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC004564818

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2024

30 janvier 2024

The Sisak Municipal Court dismissed their action by a judgment of 4 December 2007, holding that the applicants’ claim had become time‑barred (see, mutatis mutandis , Trivkanović (no. 2) , cited above,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169045

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2016

2 novembre 2016

Since none of the parties appealed, the decision became final on 28   November 2011. The applicant did not take part in these proceedings and was not informed about them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC001978207

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

On 1 July 2005 the above judgment became final but remains unenforced.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516DEC005308611

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

In this regard, the Government submitted several judgments of the Court of Cassation where this court emphasised that there was no need to wait for the proceedings to become final in order to decide on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-108131

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2011

2 décembre 2011

execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193671

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

It found that there was no dispute that the applicant had become the owner in a lawful manner ( na zakonit način ) pursuant to the sales contract concluded in 1980.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147363

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2014

22 septembre 2014

Meanwhile his arm became swollen and in the morning when they returned to their regiment, the applicant was suffering and hardly able to walk.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156295

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2015

23 juin 2015

Note: I have just become aware of this matter through rumours within the military of the mentioned post, who claim that they have not reported the situation for fear of reprisals, and because of that [

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12991

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2020

10 novembre 2020

In October 2000 the tax authorities issued it with a summons to pay, expressly stating that the purpose of the summons was to interrupt the period before the tax debt became time-barred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2917

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2007

18 janvier 2007

According to Article   357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the judgment had not become final as his appeal was still pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0830DEC003596802

Admin. suprême

30 août 2007

30 août 2007

Bearing in mind the Court’s case-law which states that the six month period runs from the date on which the applicant’s lawyer become aware of the domestic remedies, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant

Source officielle

Page 89 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.