CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 356 résultats pour « Demey »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

2ème Chambre

5fdc9dd1cfa5ad01db3f4e0a

Appel

9 novembre 2018

9 novembre 2018

Représentée par Me Gilles Z... de la SCP DEPASSE, Z..., QUESNEL, DEMAY, avocat au barreau de RENNES INTIMÉE : La société coopérative de crédit à capital variable et à responsabilité

Source officielle

Page 89 sur 368

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2079099-2236214

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2007

6 septembre 2007

Subsequently, the name cannot therefore be deemed unsuitable for a child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-83667

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2007

31 octobre 2007

As the violation found does not appear to reveal a structural problem, no other general measures are deemed necessary.     III.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-83671

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2007

31 octobre 2007

As the violation found does not appear to reveal a structural problem, no other general measures are deemed necessary.     III.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10598

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 1994

9 décembre 1994

was final and binding, did not require any further enforcement measure and was not susceptible to any ordinary or special appeal; under Greek legislation it had the force of a final decision and was deemed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3075

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

That measure was confirmed by a law providing that the owners would receive compensation, which would be deemed to have been paid once the corresponding amounts had been deposited in the applicants’ current

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC006199500

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2002

27 juin 2002

Accordingly, since an objection cannot be lodged against a decision not to provide police assistance, it cannot be deemed to be an effective remedy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2807

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2007

1 mars 2007

  Article 6 – The applicant had been able to submit to the first-instance court, then to the High Court and to the Constitutional Court, all the observations deemed necessary concerning the recording

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6226

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

The Higher Labour Court reversed the judgment, and deemed the applicant to be unsuited to continue teaching.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11466

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2001

12 juillet 2001

the expropriation in 1946 or the continuing effects produced by it up to the present date, found that the applicant as his father’s heir could not, for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, be deemed

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-714273-723718

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2003

11 mars 2003

complained, under Article 10 (right to freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights, that he had been convicted for criticising the actions of a public prosecutor which he had deemed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4942

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2003

10 avril 2003

In October 2001 the compulsory residence requirement imposed in 1998 was relaxed and the permanent exclusion order made in July 1991, which had subsequently been reduced to ten years, was deemed to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6038

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2000

11 janvier 2000

It accepted that the interference in issue had pursued a legitimate aim since it could not be deemed unreasonable for a State to take into account its own economic and budgetary resources following a far-reaching

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-656404-662359

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2002

28 novembre 2002

  In conclusion, the Court deemed it appropriate to fix a lump sum based, as far as possible, on an amount “reasonably related” to the value of the property taken, i.e. an amount which the Court would

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-214

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 1999

21 janvier 1999

On appeal the Audiencia Provincial had first stated that it accepted and deemed to be reproduced in its own decision the statement of the facts set out in the judgment at first instance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2431

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2007

29 novembre 2007

Furthermore, the applicants had taken part in adversarial proceedings in which they had been able to present all the arguments they deemed necessary to defend their interests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11464

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

  653/1977 whereby, on the building of new major roads, owners of expropriated adjoining land are deemed to benefit and are consequently required to contribute to the costs of expropriation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530DEC001040603

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2006

30 mai 2006

The Court considers that the period as such could be deemed adequate for the purposes of Article 6 § 1, particularly as the proceedings had been protracted as a result of the disappearance of the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC004654906

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

  Such conduct by the applicant – even supposing that his original application were not deemed manifestly ill-founded – is contrary to the purpose of the right of individual application, as provided

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-97136

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

whether or not the submissions called for their comments and consequently procedural fairness required that they should have been given an opportunity to assess the material and to comment on it as they deemed

Source officielle