CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD000147908
23 avril 2009
On 13 June 2005 the case files and the medical documentation were resubmitted to the main expert. 21.
Page 89 sur 131
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC004859917
2 juin 2022
In application no. 22781/18 complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 3 of the Convention.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC002466007
10 septembre 2013
Its employees were taken over by the newly-formed Counter-Intelligence Agency ( Protuobavještajna agencija – hereinafter referred to as “the CA”). 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD004892908
3 juillet 2014
The cases concerning the two car thefts were joined in July 2008. 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203JUD002202804
3 décembre 2009
, ranging from father-child relationships that were intact to those where the father was indifferent.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0312JUD002682806
12 mars 2014
There were many circumstances which were unclear and uncertain. 54. In addition, the applicable legislation continued to change and to introduce new restrictions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD006064208
16 juillet 2014
Banks were given permission to open accounts with foreign banks.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD005457800
22 mai 2008
Inside their cells, in addition to books and newspapers, detainees were in principle allowed to have battery ‑ operated radio and TV sets, but few such were witnessed. 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC003133804
25 novembre 2008
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mrs V. Lutkovska and Mr Y. Zaytsev. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC001454905
4 octobre 2011
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD003293609
21 octobre 2010
On 27 May 2005 the court files were sent to the first expert who submitted his report on 7 September 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD000265107
The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD004985310
18 janvier 2024
Nor were the applicants able to obtain attendance of witnesses on their behalf, even though their relevant requests were sufficiently reasoned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD000618903
12 février 2009
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Dimova. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD007084301
3 juillet 2008
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Kotzeva, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204JUD004100804
4 février 2010
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mrs S. Atanasova and Mrs M. Dimova, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210DEC002177305
10 février 2009
They were represented before the Court by Mr T. Purps, a lawyer practising in Potsdam. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC001832404
29 septembre 2009
Exceptions were only possible with the consent of all other owners in the building.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD006541701
2 septembre 2010
Between February 1993 and January 1997 at least sixteen hearings were held. At least four of them were adjourned due to improper summoning and one upon the applicant's request. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD003065805
6 décembre 2007
The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.H. Radu, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3.