other amount suggested by the Court.

of AS 70,000 as well as costs of the proceedings in the amount of AS 60,000.

On 23 April 2002, upon the applicant’s request, he was assigned the general pension in the amount of UAH   266.34 in the place of his special pension.

    On 14 June 1996 the court determined the provisional amount of compensation for plot no. 214.

refused to grant any default interest on that amount.

This amount included the main debt RUB   341,061.95 and compensation for the loss of value of that sum due to inflation following the lengthy non-enforcement in the amount of RUB   797,573.37

The first applicant appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court against the amount of compensation.

Law : The Government had argued that in length-of-proceedings cases in which a large number of claimants had brought proceedings collectively the amount of individual awards in respect of non-pecuniary

In order to do so, it took account of the amount claimed in respect of pecuniary damage and not the amount claimed in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

proceedings and the amount he claimed in his application before the Court (EUR 22,000 for non-pecuniary damages and EUR 3,719.81 for the costs of the proceedings).

Law : The Government had argued that in length-of-proceedings cases in which a large number of claimants had brought proceedings collectively the amount of individual awards in respect of non-pecuniary

The due amounts were paid to the applicants between April and June   1999.

    The applicant company was ordered to pay the defendants costs of proceedings in an amount which almost equalled the amount it had been awarded as compensation (see paragraphs   6 and

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

B A, représenté par Me Amrouche, demande au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative : 1°) de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle

The applicants did not claim any amount in respect of costs and expenses. 42.     The Government contested the amounts claimed, considering them to be excessive.

These were the amounts stipulated by the judgment of 28 August 2001. 10.

The applicant company complains of a violation of its rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the lack of any interest applied to the amount reimbursed.

In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at