CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115910

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2012

12 décembre 2012

On 27 July 2010 the fifteen-day time-limit for lodging appeals against the verdict of 12 July 2010 expired, and it became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56081

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Malve case delivered on 31 July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56057

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2002

6 mars 2002

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the S.M. case delivered on 18 July 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56353

Admin. suprême

24 février 2004

24 février 2004

#xa0; Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Vittorio and Luigi Mancini case delivered on 2 August 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56082

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Romo case delivered on 3 July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56052

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2002

6 mars 2002

“the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Rösslhuber case delivered on 28 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56059

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2002

6 mars 2002

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Geneste case delivered on 12 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0426DEC007276314

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2022

26 avril 2022

In so doing she relied on the Lease of Flats Act which abolished the legal concept of the specially protected tenancy and provided that the holders of such tenancies were to become “protected lessees”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0604JUD000542511

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2015

4 juin 2015

If an appeal was lodged, a judgment would become final after the examination of the case by the appellate court (unless it was quashed).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171437

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2017

26 janvier 2017

On 10 June 2009 the Ljubljana Higher Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the first-instance court’s decision, which thereby became final. 12 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1005DEC006453116

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2021

5 octobre 2021

Its final provisions stated that the Law was applicable to all persons whose convictions had become final but whose sentences had not been served in full by the date on which the Law became effective.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2008:205

CJUE

8 avril 2008

8 avril 2008

#Beecham Group plc és társai kontra Andacon NV.#Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Rechtbank van koophandel te Brussel - Belgium.#Törlés.#C-132/07. sz. ügy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD002763007

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

final but had not yet become enforceable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC003720402

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

render the remedy ineffective: it is therefore appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318JUD004261319

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2025

18 mars 2025

    One such decision extending the applicant’s pre-trial detention was rendered on 26 October 2018 and became final on 5 November 2018. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0205DEC003341203

Admin. suprême

5 février 2004

5 février 2004

    Relevant domestic law Article 327 of the Code of Criminal Procedure lists the circumstances in which “a person convicted in a judgment that has become final may be granted a re-trial”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD003234916

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

It accordingly found that since prosecuting a war crime could not become time-barred, lodging a related civil claim for damages could not become time-barred either.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-78033

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

damage sustained by the applicant company;   -   held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant company, within three months from the date at which the judgment became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169569

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

That judgment became final and enforceable on the same day. The applicant was not involved in those proceedings, and apparently was not aware of them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56098

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2002

24 juin 2002

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kadri case delivered on 27 March 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle

Page 9 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC375 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

BECAME COMPANY

SIREN 879394773Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de nancy

31/08/2026

Voir →

Créations

SCI BECAME 14

SIREN 108299538Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Caen

11/08/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

Maison Becam Malemort

SIREN 994397669Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Brive-la-Gaillarde

18/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

BECAM.MONCALIS

SIREN 814170353Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'evry

26/05/2026

Voir →

Créations

BECAM, Nicolas

SIREN 480599117Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Angers

09/05/2026

Voir →