} THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 18705/02 by Pāvels BERNĀNS against Latvia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15   June 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep

    The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish further to pursue his

The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish to pursue his application.

The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish to pursue his application.

The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish to pursue his application.

No reply has been received.

In a letter of 28 October 2008 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had been granted a residence permit which was valid until April 2013.

The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish to pursue her application.

That contrasted with the far sketchier statements that had been taken by the forensic doctor.

originated in an application (No. 28488/95) against the United Kingdom, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 29 June 1995 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Richard James Joseph

The Irish police investigation in Belfast revealed that they had both been hired on 30 November 1972 by a man using a driver’s licence in the name of Joseph Fleming.

    Relying on Article   8 of the Convention, the applicant complained that during the criminal investigation initiated against him his home had been searched, his phone had been tapped

In this respect, Chapter 2, section 7, of the 1949 Act states that a document is deemed to have been created by a public authority when it has been dispatched.

  Joseph hospital and received medication with antipsychotics.

    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 11 February 2014, which they had been unable to execute because the applicant had died before the judgment had been adopted.

    He further complained under Article 14 of the Convention that he had not been given a Russian translation of the judgments given in his case. 15.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that she had been deprived of her possessions.

He further complained that the treatment to which he had been, or would be, subjected in Greece was in breach of Articles 3, 5, 6 and 13.

In the middle of 2006 his home had been hit by a grenade which had killed his family. Moreover, in June 2007, armed men had robbed his store and beaten him.

It had been the applicants who had refused to pay. Indeed, when the Court of Appeal had assessed their means, it had not been satisfied that they had been unable to pay.