CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

7 489 résultats pour « Buresen »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242125

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2025

29 janvier 2025

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant company complains that the burden of proof placed on it by the Consiglio di Stato was impossible to discharge, given that it had no relation with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-227886

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

in libel, the courts noted a distinction between statements of fact and value judgments but went on to examine as the principal criterion whether the applicant’s statements were truthful, placing a burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230114

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2023

15 décembre 2023

  On what basis did the IQC make a finding that the applicant had knowingly engaged in “inappropriate contacts” with A.I. and shift the burden onto him to prove the contrary?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175516

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2017

19 juin 2017

In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Cindrić and   Bešlić v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705JUD003102915

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2022

5 juillet 2022

DOMESTIC CASE-LAW AND PRACTICE Burden of proof in criminal appeals 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC003798397

Admin. suprême

28 août 2001

28 août 2001

    The judge will have told the jury that the burden of proof remains upon the prosecution throughout and what the standard required is. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172749

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2017

14 mars 2017

Did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants within the meaning of that Article?”  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181750

Admin. suprême

23 février 2018

23 février 2018

In particular, did the fact that the applicant was ordered to pay a lawyer’s fee to the expropriating public authority constitute an excessive burden which upset the fair balance which must be struck between

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188463

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2018

21 novembre 2018

the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of property, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden

Source officielle
CC

civ3

60794d079ba5988459c47d4d

Cassation

29 mai 2002

29 mai 2002

Y..., associé de la société civile immobilière Bursecc (la SCI), ayant décidé de se retirer, a assigné cette société ainsi que M.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

613720f3cd580146773efbac

Cassation

19 juillet 1989

19 juillet 1989

DECLARE IRRECEVABLE le pourvoi formé contre le jugement qui, rendu le 21 février 1989 par le tribunal d'instance d'Ajaccio a statué sur le droit de Mmes Yvonne D..., Marie-Barberine E... épouse Buresi

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181933

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2018

8 mars 2018

In particular, did the fact that the applicant was ordered to pay a lawyer’s fee to the expropriating public authority constitute an excessive burden which upset the fair balance which must be struck between

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13870

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2022

8 novembre 2022

enjoyment of possessions Continuing ineffectiveness of restitution mechanism for property confiscated or nationalised by the communist regime, despite new remedies under Law no. 165/2013, placing excessive burden

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2046323-2163950

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2007

6 juillet 2007

Turkey (no. 34503/97); Burden and Burden v. United Kingdom (no. 13378/05).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002241918

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

In doing so it pointed to the distribution of the burden of proof, as established by the Court’s case-law (citing Rehbock v. Slovenia , no. 29462/95, ECHR 2000-XII; and Fyodorov and Fyodorova v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD001373015

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

They did not respond to the applicant’s complaint that the statutory burden of proof had been reversed in her court actions against the respondent national authorities. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317DEC001726823

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2026

17 mars 2026

However, the burden of putting forward the grounds and the evidence ( trditveno in dokazno breme ) in respect of the damage and the causal link between the damage suffered and the “erasure” remained to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14464

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2025

7 janvier 2025

In addition, it raised extremely sensitive questions as to the establishment of the facts and, in particular, the burden of proof.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5150

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2002

5 novembre 2002

that and, the legislation should make it possible to take account of the particular circumstances of each case, so that persons who acquired their assets in good faith are not required to bear the burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC006489014

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

The tax burden on the severance payment itself was 41%. COMPLAINTS 8.     The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No.

Source officielle

Page 9 sur 375

← PrécédentSuivant →