Turkey 15/03/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to

  As to how long a delay was capable of constituting a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, here too the reference should be a maximum delay of six months from the date on which the decision,

and complicity in defamation against Mr   Le Pen.

but, having regard to the additional balancing exercise inherent in prohibition proceedings due to delay, it could not constitute an effective remedy for a complaint of unreasonable delay within the meaning

Although the applicant had pursued a series of fruitless appeals, there had also been delays in the case attributable to the State authorities totalling approximately three years.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 30 juillet 2024, la société anonyme à responsabilité limitée (SARL) Demay et Fils demande au tribunal d’annuler l’avis de sommes à payer en

It examined the appeal anew, quashing the first-instance judgment and dismissing the defamation action as ill-founded.

/other facilities Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   7. 37256/20 Haksal v.

Turkey   21/03/2017 Failure/Delay in examining requests for enlargement/objection Lack of hearing during the detention review Restriction of access to the investigation file Failure/Delay to communicate

D E C I D E : Article 1er : La requête de la société DEFA est rejetée.

Ms   O. and Ms   S. filed a private prosecution for defamation against Ms   R.

Law : Article 6 § 1 - The case was not complex and although some delays were due to the applicant's illness, the State was responsible for the delays resulting from the failure of prosecution witnesses

Türkiye 22/11/2019 Suat REÇBER 1978 Ankara Turkish   Lack of hearing during the detention review Failure/Delay in examining requests for release/objection Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating

proceedings and because of defamation of his character and his inability to use his rifles.

The request was registered as a matter of suspected public defamation. In the ensuing pre-trial investigation 36 persons, including the applicants, were heard as suspects of public defamation.

La SARL DEFA a formulé trois autres demandes de délivrance de CEE les 30 juillet 2015, 20 novembre 2014 et 23 décembre 2014.

On 9 March 2006 the applicant applied to the criminal court to speed-up the proceedings in view of the short limitation period in respect of defamation.

and complicity in defamation against Mr   Le Pen.

No explanation has been advanced by the State to account for this delay, which was all the more regrettable when proceedings had already been subject to substantial delay. 67.

Delays due to above three factors therefore beyond jurisdiction of domestic legal system. 2.