7448/15) against the Republic of Malta lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mr Emanuel Ciantar

suivant, Après que l’instruction eut été clôturée le 11 Septembre 2023, et que la cause eut été débattue à l’audience publique du 04 Juin 2024 devant : Delphine SAILLOFEST, Vice-Président, Marc-Emmanuel

    Article 63 (6) of the Government Lands Act reads as follows: “Everyone shall forfeit his right of action in accordance with this article if he fails to proceed within thirty years from when

D’Ascia, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

The sharing of the responsibility for the conduct of the proceedings, as well as the substantial saving of costs for the individual applicant which would normally follow from being a party to joint proceedings

Further, the Committee wishes to be informed of the outcome of the review and the follow-up steps planned to remedy the current situation.” THE LAW I.

application lodged on 12 July 1999, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

It follows that the Government’s preliminary objection must be dismissed. 9.

    The applicant complained that that she had been subjected to ill ‑ treatment in the gendarmerie station in breach of Article 3 of the Convention which reads as follows: “No one shall

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. BACKGROUND 5.

She relied on Article   3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” A.

It follows that the situation at issue has allowed the administration to take advantage of an unlawful procedure, appropriating the land in breach of the rules governing expropriation in good and due form

  Romania (nos. 9584/02, 33514/02, 38052/02, 25821/02, 29652/03, 3736/03, 17750/03 and 28688/04, 29 April 2014), Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows

Italy (no. 56317/00)   Violation Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Emanuele Argenti, is an Italian national who was born in 1956.

de nationalité Française [Adresse 3] [Localité 13] 2/ MACSF (MUTUELLE D'ASSURANCES DU CORPS DE SANTÉ FRANÇAIS) RCS 775 665 631 [Adresse 9] [Adresse 9] [Localité 6] Représentant : Me Emmanuelle

The Constitutional Court gave judgment on 23 May 2008, holding, in sum, as follows. 34.     Although interpretative, Law 296/2006 was innovative.

the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows