CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

612 résultats pour « Evelyne SKILLAS-MAYER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154664

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2015

23 avril 2015

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114951

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

Many member states from central and eastern Europe are only beginning to recognise the potential development and other benefits of engaging their diasporas in a more institutionalised manner, especially

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1106DEC004854299

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2003

6 novembre 2003

On 17 May 2001 the Białystok Regional Court quashed the District Court’s decision of 8 February 2001.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD002297202

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Lyutykh v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   J.-P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC006389600

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

If the debtor fails to comply with this obligation, further time-limits may be fixed and further fines may be imposed by a court.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC003421511

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

    On 18 October 2001 the second applicant submitted a complaint to the Łódź Regional Prosecutor about the manner in which the case had been handled. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159658

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2015

1 décembre 2015

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016REP002552394

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 1996

16 octobre 1996

The appeal court may, inter alia, affirm or set aside a conviction and may affirm, vary or quash a sentence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD001722113

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

Austria (no. 1) , 23 May 1991, § 57, Series A no. 204). Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Prager and Oberschlick v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD000096512

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2020

15 octobre 2020

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Guz v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC006211010

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

[S.K.] may regress and her functioning may deteriorate as she becomes more in touch with the damage that has been caused to her.” 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0915DEC004638999

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2003

15 septembre 2003

Paarhammer did not even shrink from publicly criticising and disparaging the Pope in an extremely offensive manner, while Sieberer insulted Laun as soon as he was appointed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1215DEC002495294

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1998

15 décembre 1998

The judge added that the applicant would have the possibility of benefiting from his professional skills either on behalf of another company or on his own.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD005975115

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2020

10 septembre 2020

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of G.L. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD000533505

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

In their view, the manner in which domestic law regulated this matter bred a lack of clarity, led to errors and abuse and had imposed a disproportionate burden on them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108JUD004788111

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2019

8 janvier 2019

For the following day he might no longer admit to anything, he may switch to another political party, if he is given more, he may even sell part of the electoral district where he ran and if nobody wants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC003643797

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2000

5 septembre 2000

it may rightly be questioned whether it was reasonable to expect the senior consultant to respond in such a manner… However, the High Court cannot see that [the applicant] has been able to establish as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD003651619

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2021

2 décembre 2021

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Jallow v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0829DEC004133409

Admin. suprême

29 août 2017

29 août 2017

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016REP002564894

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 1996

16 octobre 1996

  On 4 May 1993 the transcript of the trial judge's summing up to the jury was filed.

Source officielle

Page 9 sur 31

← PrécédentSuivant →