trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence;Proved guilty

On 30   October 2017 the Cherepovets Town Court of the Vologda Region found the applicant guilty as charged and gave him a conditional sentence of 2.5 years’ imprisonment and a 3 years’ driving ban

On 18   August 2015 the District Court found the defendants guilty as charged. The applicant was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and a fine. The defendants appealed.

In appeals against conviction following a plea of guilty, the somewhat mechanical test of whether a change of plea to guilty was ‘founded upon’ a particular feature of the trial, namely a wrong direction

On 13/07/2018 the Odesa Regional Court of Appeal upheld the 1st instance court judgment finding the applicant guilty of a breach of the customs rules, Article 471 of the Customs Code.

The applicant finally pleaded not guilty in respect of parts 16 and 19 but pleaded guilty to attempted burglary.

    According to the judge, only a part of the assets had had its origin in the offences of which the applicant had been found guilty in Italy.

Le délibéré a été prorogé au 19 Mai 2026 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors du délibéré Guillaume RENOULT-DJAZIRI, Président Sonia ZOUAG et Loïse PREVOST, assesseurs assistés de Audrey GUILLOT, greffier

According to the GUP, the applicant, together with her husband G. and nine other people (some of whom had also been found guilty of drug trafficking in the same proceedings), had constituted a criminal

Such assertions are also tantamount to recognising that the applicant was guilty.

In April 1999 the Tata District Court, after having held three hearings, found the applicant guilty of breach of domicile.

  He was found guilty by the central military court, sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and discharged from the armed forces.

Following the jury’s guilty verdict, the applicant was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.

Turkey - 15014/11 Judgment 18.12.2018 [Section II] Article 2 Positive obligations Suspension of pronouncement of judgment against police officer found guilty of causing life-threatening injury by use of

chambre de l'instruction a méconnu les textes et le principe ci-dessus mentionnés" ; Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué et des pièces de la procédure, qu'à la suite du décès de l'enfant Enolla Guille

Mr Kabai was found guilty of murder, animal cruelty and theft on 25   April 2012 by the Debrecen Court of Appeal and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

Upon the appointment of a lawyer, the Regional Court held a new hearing, during which the applicant’s lawyer was present, and found him guilty of the charges brought against him.

on 3 August 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant, a retired military intelligence officer, who was found guilty

On 2 March 2017 the applicant was found guilty and fined EUR 100 in minor-offence proceedings of disturbing public peace and order by hitting a certain M.P. with a fist in the head on 17 August 2015 in