CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 009 résultats pour « Julia CANETTE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD004298106

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and André Wampach

Page 9 sur 51

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC005171413

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

Application no. 51714/13 Slobodan ĐUROVIĆ against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 7   March 2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Işıl Karakaş, President,   Julia

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cd83bd3db21cbdd93912

Appel

23 janvier 2017

23 janvier 2017

APPELANT Monsieur Gilbert Kévin Julian Y... ... ... 97190 GOSIER Comparant en personne Assisté de M. Raymond Z...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC003046608

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

Rights (First Section), sitting on 3   November 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD001204705

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

It cannot therefore be claimed that the applicant’s request to have examined witnesses in his defence was vexatious or that he made no reasonable effort to obtain their attendance. 44.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC001439704

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2011

25 janvier 2011

composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President ,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Zdravka Kalaydjieva,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Angelika Nußberger,   Julia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC002306007

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   George Nicolaou,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318DEC004141221

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2025

18 mars 2025

  23893/03, §   156, 15 May 2012);   whether the measure complied with domestic law (see   Julin v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD005663710

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2014

30 octobre 2014

If the non-criminal issue cannot be resolved within this time, it should be analysed within the criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD000190004

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

The certificates prepared by the Russian authorities five years after the events in question cannot be regarded as sufficiently reliable sources of data. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD004667706

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

#xa0; Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   Zdravka Kalaydjieva,   Angelika Nußberger,   Julia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0507JUD001299305

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2015

7 mai 2015

The Court finds accordingly that it cannot consider whether or not the period between 20   April and 22 July 2003 was compatible with the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0402DEC002666005

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2019

2 avril 2019

    As regards their complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning non-enforcement of court judgments, the Court reiterates that a person cannot complain about a violation of his or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC003487209

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

DECISION Application no. 34872/09 Ayşe ÇAKMAK and Enes ÇAKMAK against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 21   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Julia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0228JUD005687511

Admin. suprême

28 février 2017

28 février 2017

  In the case of Manoli v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Işıl Karakaş, President,   Julia Laffranque,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC006016100

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2005

10 mai 2005

He is represented before the Court by Ms   Anke   Julia Stock, of the Kurdish Human Rights Project in London.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0205DEC000162803

Admin. suprême

5 février 2007

5 février 2007

She lodged the application also in the name of her daughter Julia Köhler (second applicant), a German national born in 1996. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD001943307

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2012

31 juillet 2012

[The applicant] cannot answer any specific question. Her submissions contradict each other, they also contradict her husband’s statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD006895511

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

The investigating judge considers that the request is well-founded because the investigation cannot be carried out by other means, so it is necessary to temporarily limit the constitutional rights and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD004519713

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2016

25 octobre 2016

The Convention, including Article 6, cannot be interpreted in a vacuum (see Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 37112/97, § 35, ECHR 2001 ‑ XI (extracts)).

Source officielle