(S.K.’s wife) had rung his door and requested his help in breaking into her locked bathroom.

  As war children, the applicants claimed to have been subjected to ill-treatment, including: Werner Hermann Thiermann (born in 1941) was locked up in a scorching-hot pig sty with another war child

He was then found by the police in a locked cubicle in the ladies’ toilets of the pub.

    For a period of twelve days in June 2006 the prison authorities kept the first applicant’s cell locked as punishment for the smuggling of a mobile phone by another inmate whereas normally

2016 the applicant’s lawyer sought, unsuccessfully, to have the Italian police revoke the refusal-of-entry order and explained that the applicant was confined on board the ship in a cabin that was locked

The windows were fitted with iron bars and the door remained locked. There was no supervision in the room. He went on hunger strike to protest about his confinement.

The door was locked. He then walked towards the kitchen window and shouted Mr Aritkulov’s name a couple of times.

In reply, the applicants submitted that they had been the victims of human trafficking in Italy and had been locked up in an apartment and ill-treated by the traffickers.

  The European Court noted that the applicant was locked in a vicious circle in which the national courts were pointing at each other and refusing to hear her case in view of the alleged limitations

conditions of detention in Grīva Prison had been disputed between the parties, with regard to Daugavpils Prison it had not been disputed that on arrival and before departure the applicant had been locked

O.P. locked the applicant inside the house and left for approximately forty-five minutes. The applicant attempted to escape but was not able and there was no telephone in the house.

Among other things, he claims that prison inmates were locked in their cells for 21 hours a day with nothing to do, that after 10 days’ detention, inmates were permitted on the following Saturday a maximum

proceedings against the applicant could be considered to have involved the determination of a criminal charge against the applicant given that she had been deprived of her liberty for five days and locked

    The applicant had no access to work and spent most of the day locked up in his cell, leaving it only for ninety minutes of outdoor exercise.

The intruders had then locked the first applicant and her relatives up.

    Subsequently, some members of the group closed the door to the corridor and locked themselves in the corridor by toppling metal cupboards behind the door.

    The applicant alleged that he was held alone in a locked cell measuring 1.9 by 4.05 metres. He could leave the cell only for his daily one ‑ hour walk.

According to the second applicant, the windows of the factory were bricked up, the only door was locked from the outside and he believed that the factory was guarded.

However, according to the Government, cells are only locked at 11 p.m., remaining so until 6 a.m. in all blocks with the exception of Block 1, where cells are locked all the time.

The applicant had then been locked in the committal cell, where he had later been visited by Mr Loth and Mr Römer.