CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 450 résultats pour « Reichking »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD003375416

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2022

20 septembre 2022

that in any event, by reaching for the hammer, the applicant had provoked the prison guards’ reaction (see paragraph 24 above).

Source officielle
CA

2ème Chambre civile

6438f237a942a604f5e933b5

Appel

13 avril 2023

13 avril 2023

APPELANTE : Madame [V] [O] [P] [B] [U] épouse [C] née le [Date naissance 1] 1960 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 6] [Localité 4] représentée et assistée de Me Gaël BALAVOINE, substitué par Me REICHLING

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178836

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2017

25 octobre 2017

verdict sheet prepared in contravention of the provisions of the rules of criminal procedure prevented the jury from assessing correctly the matter and carrying out properly their duties and rights when reaching

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13994

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2023

31 janvier 2023

Moreover, according to the Court of Cassation, judicial recognition of a “neutral” gender would have far-reaching consequences for the rules of French law, constructed on the basis of a binary system of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0831DEC004034598

Admin. suprême

31 août 2000

31 août 2000

The case was adjourned so that the parties could discuss the possibility of reaching a settlement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166768

Admin. suprême

22 août 2016

22 août 2016

In reaching its decision, the Board took Article 8 of the Convention into consideration.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0902DEC000355417

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2025

2 septembre 2025

Even assuming that he had been insulted by the police during his arrest, the incident had been instantaneous and had not caused any mental damage, thereby not reaching the threshold of severity required

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-432100-432705

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2001

16 octobre 2001

    In reaching this conclusion, the Court took into account the entirety of the proceedings, in particular the fact that the applicant’s lawyer had been heard in the appeal proceedings before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7080

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2000

27 juin 2000

In particular, the Government had referred, without being contradicted on the point, to negotiations between the applicant and the ACIP with a view to reaching an agreement whereby the applicant could

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3706

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2005

6 octobre 2005

It might also be said that the law in the United Kingdom was less far-reaching than in certain other States.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5565

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2012

17 juillet 2012

Article 8: Deprivation of parental rights was a particularly far-reaching measure that should only be applied in exceptional circumstances, when justified by an overriding requirement pertaining to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11862

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2018

20 mars 2018

Furthermore, the Court was not convinced that the impugned statements could be considered as an attack reaching the requisite threshold of seriousness and capable of causing prejudice to M.F.’s personal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12251

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

As for the alleged impact on judge G.E.’s professional reputation, the Court was not convinced that the impugned press release or the interview could have been considered as an attack reaching the requisite

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC004925918

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2021

21 octobre 2021

In reaching this conclusion, the Court has taken into account its competence under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention to restore the case to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3061

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

It had not been unreasonable or arbitrary to consider that Judge   D.’s defence rights might be affected, having regard, in particular, to the far-reaching powers of the commission of inquiry and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201607

Admin. suprême

7 février 2020

7 février 2020

In reaching that decision the Commission relied on classified information by the State Security Department which was not revealed to the applicant company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10774

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2015

23 juin 2015

Indeed, before relinquishing the case, the military court had based its judgment convicting the applicant, of June 1998, on grounds which were not used by the civilian courts in their judgments reaching

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11822

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

In reaching that conclusion, the Court had regard to the following factors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-114

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

It was common practice for the courts to take into account, in reaching their decision, the fact that one of the parties had sought to prevent certain facts from being established.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC004498405

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

In reaching this conclusion, the Court has taken into account its competence under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention to restore the case to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify

Source officielle

Page 9 sur 173

← PrécédentSuivant →