The application included details of what was being sought and how the proposed action was proportionate to what it sought to achieve.

    In case no. 32053/13, on what dates and by what method was a copy of the appeal lodged by the defendant on 15 August 2011 and of the rulings of the judge of the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative

If so, when, and what rights was she informed about?

  To what extent were the delays in the procedure imputable to the authorities?

If so, what is the procedure for doing so? What was the first applicant’s registered ethnicity (“ narodnost ”) before 2007?

In particular, what direct and corroborating evidence was used for the applicant’s conviction (see   Pichugin v. Russia , no. 38623/03, 23   October   2012)? 2.

What was the exact aim of the operation? What police department did the officers involved belong to? What was the exact information available to the authorities in respect of the applicant?

What is the legal framework governing notification of first-instance judgments to persons detained in prison?

What was the exact aim of the operation? What police department did the officers involved belong to? What was the exact information available to the authorities in respect of the applicant?

was followed home from school by a man who forced his way into the family home and subjected him to a violent sexual assault before warning him at knife-point that he would be killed if he told anyone what

We did not pay those 500 dollars since we knew what kind of a man he was. We thought we would try everything first and only then...

On what grounds did the police officers consider the applicants’ gathering unlawful?

What evidence is there to establish those facts? How exactly have the applicants asserted their rights in that respect?

is today the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("FBi H") before the war, who then moved to what is today the Republika Srpska ("RS") during the war, and who, for that reason only still received RS

The fact that the alleged perpetrator had been a member of law enforcement himself, and that the threats he had used against the victim and her family had referred to that fact and what he considered to

If so, what decision did the vetting institutions take in respect of such request?

What act (document or physical action) constituted the interference in the present cases? What was the law applicable to the relevant form of deprivation of property?

(A)    What does Ku Klux Klan mean to you? (G)    It means a great deal, because I think what they do is right.

If yes, what are those restrictions?   2.

What proof had been used by the domestic courts in the course of such review?