On 24 September 2014 the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the Yasamal District Court’s search warrant of 4 September 2014 on appeal, endorsing its reasoning. 10.

    The Court reiterates that in a number of previous Russian cases it was the vagueness and excessively broad terms of search warrants giving the authority executing them unrestricted discretion

In December 1993 the applicants were questioned as suspects in the destruction of a walnut tree owned by a State-owned company.

On 3 September 1998 a court issued a warrant for the applicant’s remand for 30 days. He was declared a wanted person.

Then, warrant officer A.S. had made several warning shots in the air, but the applicant and his companions had continued to run away.

that he had not been informed that the applicant had been removed from detention and had been taken before the Senate although he had been the one who had heard the applicant and had issued the arrest warrant

The same day the prosecutor applied to the Centru District Court for a warrant for the applicants’ detention in custody.

poursuites et diligences de son représentant légal pour ce domicilié en cette qualité audit siège 11 boulevard du Président Allende CS 90014 62014 ARRAS CEDEX Représenté et plaidant par Me Carl WALLART

Greffier, lors des débats : Mme WALLAERT, Greffier ARRET : - contradictoire - prononcé par mise à disposition au greffe par Mme FERMAUT, Magistrat honoraire, faisant fonction de Président de

Greffier, lors des débats : Mme WALLAERT, Greffier ARRET : - contradictoire - prononcé par mise à disposition au greffe par Mme FERMAUT, Magistrat honoraire, faisant fonction de Président de chambre

petition, the applicant’s lawyer submitted a number of documents to the Ankara Administrative Court, including a document downloaded from the Atyrau police department website, according to which an arrest warrant

However, the exceptional character of the circumstances that might warrant the lifting of the corporate veil essentially came down to the nature of the issues to be decided by the competent national court

Furthermore, this fact in itself is not sufficient to warrant legitimate doubts as to his impartiality.

This is considered to be unlawful in terms of the Azerbaijani law and the Azerbaijani authorities issued an international arrest warrant in respect of the applicant.

Government (“the Government”) under Rule 39; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 24 August 2022 the applicant was arrested in Italy on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant

The Iraqi authorities issued arrest warrants for both individuals in 2006.

On 16 November 1993, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) issued a direction of no prosecution on the basis of insufficient evidence to warrant prosecution.

special safeguards for lawyers: no special instructions by a judge regarding privileged materials, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant