CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222965
9 janvier 2023
present case, the general twenty-year limitation period should have applied and (iii) the provisions applied by the courts in his case were contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, because
Page 92 sur 1597
ECLI:CEDH:001-164547
8 juin 2016
In his appeals of 1 October 2009 and before the Centru District Court on 23 November 2009 the applicant complained that the extension of his detention had been unlawful because the application for
ECLI:CEDH:001-245402
16 septembre 2025
On 4 January 2011 the prison doctor recommended blood transfusion because of the applicant’s low haemoglobin levels.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3648
24 novembre 2005
The District Council did not give clearance because the sale would result in a reduction of his under-age son’s property, and, hence, not in his interests.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CO00782
6 décembre 2023
Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de Me Bertrand, avocat de la société Quick restaurants, et l'avis de M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00053
29 janvier 2025
Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SAS Boulloche, Colin, Stoclet et Associés, avocat de M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00570
13 novembre 2025
Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseillère référendaire, les observations de la SARL Cabinet Rousseau et Tapie, avocat de M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002195693
22 février 1995
It is added that the sales contract with E. could be approved because the buyer had eventually agreed to pay AS 40 instead of AS 30 per square meter and because the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD004384211
4 juillet 2019
This was not because we considered that it was wrong to award the applicant company just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damages but on the contrary because we considered that the applicant was entitled
ECLI:CEDH:001-115414
21 novembre 2012
On 1 October 2001 the applicant requested that the court order a fine, because the child’s mother did not cooperate.
ECLI:CEDH:001-117010
6 février 2013
This was so because by the time the applicant had bought the property, Mr S. had already paid off the judgment debt, which meant that the enforcement proceedings had had to be discontinued; there had been
ECLI:CEDH:001-173633
26 avril 2017
By a decision of 6 July 2011 the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the applicant’s constitutional complaint because the case did not raise any constitutional issue.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155110
12 mai 2015
Because his economic situation was very difficult, the applicant eventually agreed to try to procure cocaine. He alleges that Mike subsequently called him almost every day asking for the drugs.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC000140022
9 juillet 2024
They argued in that connection that they had been unable to make an advance payment themselves and had thus been discriminated against because of their financial situation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-215020
16 décembre 2021
On the other hand, you had others who remained passive, either because of lethargy or because they were satisfied with the situation as stood.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513DEC005777616
13 mai 2025
The Government submitted that the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention should be dismissed because the applicant had failed to exhaust effective domestic remedies. 34.
ECLI:CEDH:001-122652
18 juin 2013
On 4 December 2008 the second applicant left the vocational school because he did not cope with his study duties.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001580804
27 janvier 2009
Two hearings were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings, five because of the judge’s illness, two because the judge was on leave, and one because he was travelling on official business
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD004054304
4 décembre 2008
This judgment became binding on 17 May 2004 and was enforced on 11 November 2005. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-141183
22 janvier 2014
The prosecutor concluded that the fire had broken out because of M.M.’s fault and that he had died as a result of his burns.