CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

31 923 résultats pour « Becaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222965

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2023

9 janvier 2023

present case, the general twenty-year limitation period should have applied and (iii) the provisions applied by the courts in his case were contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, because

Source officielle

Page 92 sur 1597

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164547

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2016

8 juin 2016

In his appeals of 1 October 2009 and before the Centru District Court on 23   November 2009 the applicant complained that the extension of his detention had been unlawful because the application for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245402

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2025

16 septembre 2025

On 4 January 2011 the prison doctor recommended blood transfusion because of the applicant’s low haemoglobin levels.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3648

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

The District Council did not give clearance because the sale would result in a reduction of his under-age son’s property, and, hence, not in his interests.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CO00782

Cassation

6 décembre 2023

6 décembre 2023

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de Me Bertrand, avocat de la société Quick restaurants, et l'avis de M.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00053

Cassation

29 janvier 2025

29 janvier 2025

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations de la SAS Boulloche, Colin, Stoclet et Associés, avocat de M.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:CO00570

Cassation

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseillère référendaire, les observations de la SARL Cabinet Rousseau et Tapie, avocat de M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002195693

Admin. suprême

22 février 1995

22 février 1995

        It is added that the sales contract with E. could be approved because the buyer had eventually agreed to pay AS 40 instead of AS 30 per square meter and because the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD004384211

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2019

4 juillet 2019

This was not because we considered that it was wrong to award the applicant company just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damages but on the contrary because we considered that the applicant was entitled

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115414

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2012

21 novembre 2012

On 1 October 2001 the applicant requested that the court order a fine, because the child’s mother did not cooperate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117010

Admin. suprême

6 février 2013

6 février 2013

This was so because by the time the applicant had bought the property, Mr S. had already paid off the judgment debt, which meant that the enforcement proceedings had had to be discontinued; there had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173633

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2017

26 avril 2017

By a decision of 6 July 2011 the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the applicant’s constitutional complaint because the case did not raise any constitutional issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155110

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

Because his economic situation was very difficult, the applicant eventually agreed to try to procure cocaine. He alleges that Mike subsequently called him almost every day asking for the drugs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC000140022

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2024

9 juillet 2024

They argued in that connection that they had been unable to make an advance payment themselves and had thus been discriminated against because of their financial situation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215020

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

On the other hand, you had others who remained passive, either because of lethargy or because they were satisfied with the situation as stood.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513DEC005777616

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2025

13 mai 2025

    The Government submitted that the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention should be dismissed because the applicant had failed to exhaust effective domestic remedies. 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122652

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

On 4 December 2008 the second applicant left the vocational school because he did not cope with his study duties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001580804

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

Two hearings were adjourned because the judge was involved in other proceedings, five because of the judge’s illness, two because the judge was on leave, and one because he was travelling on official business

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD004054304

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

This judgment became binding on 17 May 2004 and was enforced on 11 November 2005. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141183

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2014

22 janvier 2014

The prosecutor concluded that the fire had broken out because of M.M.’s fault and that he had died as a result of his burns.

Source officielle