The judge suspected of bribery did not have time to make the judgment in respect of the accused person.

When he asked why he had been detained the only answer he received was that he should not have left his house before 9 May (Soviet Victory Day in the Second World War). 41 .

    The applicants have not seen Beslan Baysultanov since. 2.     The Government’s account 15.

According to A.K., A.A. could not have influenced the applicants either, because he was not a law-enforcement officer and thus had no reason to do so. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 72.

    The Supreme Court noted that under section 61 of the 2001 Law a   judge should have an unblemished character.

The Kazakhstan authorities further undertook to comply with Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 13 and 14 of the Convention, in particular, to ensure that the applicant would have a fair trial.

effective remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as an action in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 20   January 2015 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro , President ,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Each inmate should have no less than four square metres of personal space in his or her cell. 30.

The seizure order was open to appeal before the Supreme Court ( Vrhovni sud Republike Hrvatske ), but such appeals did not have suspensive effect. 12.

Court notes that no regime of strict lockdowns has been in force, most of COVID-19 related restrictions had been eased, and indoors and outdoors sports, cultural, entertainment and other events could have

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

as a Chamber composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

him and to have him and three other members of parliament detained.

After undergoing conservative treatment, the applicant was considered to have been cured of bronchitis. 16 .

    The applicants have not seen their four relatives since 16 July 2003. 2.

against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Moldovan nationals, Mr Alexandru

lack of or insufficient natural light 408 days in compensation for a total period of detention spent in inadequate conditions from 24/07/2012 to 20/03/2018 1,000     11421/16 17/03/2016 Alexandru

  The Court found that the grounds on which the courts relied to prolong the applicants’ detention may have been valid initially but could not be used to justify keeping the applicants in custody