CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1905497-2013213

Admin. suprême

1 février 2007

1 février 2007

If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1371427-1431800

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

Firstly, the authorities became actively involved in the applicant’s placement in the clinic when the police, by use of force, had brought her back to the clinic from which she had fled.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2369090-2556129

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

Despite their requests, the applicants had never received any plausible explanation or information as to what became of Rizvan Ibragimov following his kidnapping.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-670704-677855

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2002

17 décembre 2002

in particular, that their rights under Articles 6 and 8 had been violated through the separation of their family, which was not justified on medical grounds and was not discontinued as soon as this became

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-687182-694690

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2003

28 janvier 2003

If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1375347-1435884

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

Following the break-up of the Soviet Union and the restoration of Latvia’s independence in 1991, the applicants, who had previously been Soviet nationals, became stateless.

Source officielle
CE

6 SS

CETAT:CETATEXT000007836025

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1993

1 décembre 1993

31 juillet 1990 du préfet de Saône et Loire en tant qu'il fixe, au delà du 31 janvier 1991, la date de clôture de la chasse de certaines espèces de gibier d'eau et des oiseaux de passage (grives, bécasses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210114

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2021

21 avril 2021

In his advisory opinion the Advocate General at the Supreme Court also made   no   observations to the effect that the prosecution would have become time-barred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD000085202

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

On 19 October 1999 the Novosibirsk Regional Court upheld the judgment, which became enforceable on the same day. The judgment was never executed. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD000084202

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

On 19 October 1999 the Novosibirsk Regional Court upheld the judgment, which became enforceable on the same day. The judgment was never executed. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD000094402

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

On 7 October 1999 the Novosibirsk Regional Court upheld the judgment, which became enforceable on the same day. The judgment was never executed. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1003JUD004457498

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2008

3 octobre 2008

The change was entered in the Register of Companies the same day and became effective on 1 January 1990. 47.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD001206012

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2016

12 avril 2016

35 § 1 to take the start of the six-month period as the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see idem, §   260 and Varnava and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520DEC001290823

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2025

20 mai 2025

over a long period of time, the right to compensation might become illusory.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202DEC005312199

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

On 19 December 1996 the applicant visited a café-bar where he drank and became intoxicated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010JUD002056702

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2006

10 octobre 2006

(Application no. 20567/02)       JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   10 October 2006       FINAL     10/01/2007       This judgment will become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329JUD007304301

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2007

29 mars 2007

xa0; (Application no. 73043/01)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   29 March 2007       FINAL     29/06/2007     This judgment will become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD006290412

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2018

11 janvier 2018

    This judgment was upheld in the final instance by the Court of Cassation and it became final on 4 November 2009. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD000175202

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

The judgment became enforceable on 22 June 1999 when the Penza Regional Court upheld it on appeal. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0115JUD000347904

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2008

15 janvier 2008

The judgment was not challenged and after fifteen days it became final and enforceable. 10.

Source officielle

Page 94 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.