COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that his trial was not fair because the judge had formed a pre-conceived idea of his guilt, because the main witness, Ms Sh., did not

that she had been badly treated by the medical staff, that the decisions concerning her deprivation of liberty were unlawful and unjustified and that her reputation in the community had been ruined because

Such a contract is not null and void, because a contract on sale of the other’s object obliges the contractual parties (section 460 of the Obligations Act).

He asked for an extension of the time-limit for appeal, claiming that it had been missed because the applicant had not been represented at the time and had insufficient command of Russian to understand

He claimed that he had not been able to challenge the termination of his contract before the domestic courts because, since the entrance to the local court building was not specially adapted, he could

On 1 May 2007 police officers took a number of security measures in Istanbul because of May the First International Labour Day celebrations and there was therefore a large police presence on the streets

At about 3 p.m. his assistant was brought to move him to another car, because the first one was going to be impounded as physical evidence.

The applicant in application no. 21694/20 was fined on 25 August 2018 because he had participated in a gathering at the Arc de Triomphe in Bucharest which had not been notified to the authorities and had

On 14 December 2001 a private person K. lodged a complaint with a court, seeking to cancel the registration of Mr Antonenko because he had allegedly omitted to enter a part of his income on his property

  -           The Court held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR on private life grounds because AA has made commendable efforts to

  The Court held that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR on private life grounds because AA has made commendable efforts to rehabilitate himself over a seven year period and that,

September 2013 the applicant initiated court proceedings against Sh., his daughter, seeking a declaration that she had lost her right to live as a co-tenant in a flat owned by a local municipal company because

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 8 October 2000 and was rejected on 28 November 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

Following those judgments, the applicants initiated new domestic proceedings claiming that they were still unable to find employment in the private sector because the KGB Act had not been amended.

She became depressed as a result of the substantial pecuniary loss she suffered because of the transaction, which she considered fraudulent. In June 2007 she attempted to commit suicide.

    The applicant was then summoned to the court hearing on three occasions, but none of the summonses have ever been served on him, allegedly because service had been attempted to his presumed

Bulgaria - 46343/99 Judgment 23.5.2006 [Section V] Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to leave a country Travel ban because of unpaid taxes: violation   Article

On 11 May 2016 the District Court declared that the second applicant lacked legal capacity because of her illness.

Accordingly, the arbitrators imposed on the applicant would have indirectly determined the scope of jurisdiction of the ordinary courts because, if they had made an arbitration award on the merits of the

However, the fixed penalty nevertheless became payable under Section 32 (1) of the 1999 Act.