CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD004428306

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2013

2 mai 2013

No complaints were made by him [at that time]. Police officers ... B. and N. were also questioned in the context of the investigation carried out by the prosecutor’s office.

Page 94 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD001344807

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2010

14 octobre 2010

His complaints, however, were to no avail. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD002099914

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

Records of the applicant’s calls were obtained from mobile operators.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0706DEC001201586

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1988

6 juillet 1988

  The assessment concluded by advising against offering the applicant the job unless the BBC were to decide that there were good reasons for doing otherwise.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD003433103

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2008

27 novembre 2008

In particular, the victim and all important witnesses were duly questioned and forensic medical examinations were held.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2913236-3202538

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2009

29 octobre 2009

Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows:   Peer Lorenzen (Denmark), President , Renate Jaeger (Germany), Jean-Paul Costa (France), Rait Maruste (Estonia), Mark Villiger (Liechtenstein), Isabelle

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2780947-3044226

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2009

25 juin 2009

  In January 2004 he was convicted as charged and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, 18 months of which were suspended.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2405083-2594710

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2008

25 juin 2008

Furthermore, as those employers were not taxpayers in Latvia, there was no reason for the applicant to be covered by the Latvian mandatory social-insurance scheme.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2872585-3151186

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2009

24 septembre 2009

Chamber of seven 7 judges composed as follows:   Peer Lorenzen (Denmark), President , Renate Jaeger (Germany), Jean-Paul Costa (France), Rait Maruste (Estonia), Mark Villiger (Liechtenstein), Isabelle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004426013

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2014

17 juillet 2014

The letter concerned the applicant and twelve other individuals who were presumed to be nationals of Uzbekistan.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD001022613

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2014

31 juillet 2014

The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC007387411

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

There were also 2,000 places in centres in which asylum seekers were supposed to stay for a maximum of six months, although there were exceptions for vulnerable persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303DEC004344304

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

The defendants in all cases were public authorities (in the most cases military units or the Ministry of Defence).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414DEC000008805

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2015

14 avril 2015

Thirty-four names were on the list of candidates. 39.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD001494503

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2014

3 avril 2014

These crimes were of a violent character and aggravated by the fact that the perpetrators had been associates previously. There were four co-accused in this case, including the applicant. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD003404408

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

All the cells were of the same size and the conditions of detention were the same. 26.     The cells were overcrowded and the inmates had to take turns to sleep.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0507JUD001299305

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2015

7 mai 2015

There were windows that let in enough light. Lavatories were separated from the rest of the cells with partitions. 29 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146497

Admin. suprême

27 août 2014

27 août 2014

    Background of the case The applicants or their ascendants or spouses (in the cases where the applicants are heirs of a deceased individual) are or were all pensioners (retired prior to 31

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC002608413

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2023

14 décembre 2023

  1 concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of “Pinto” domestic decisions were communicated to the Italian Government (“the Government”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD004715206

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2013

14 novembre 2013

The lights were kept on all night. 24. During the day inmates were forbidden to lie on their beds or to enter the bedroom.

Source officielle