Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196791
17 septembre 2019
17 septembre 2019
Upon her discharge from the hospital, the guardianship authority advised her against returning to the flat where E. had abused her because of a risk of recurrent violence on his part.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148593
13 novembre 2014
13 novembre 2014
It was held inter alia that because of the nature and seriousness of his convictions, the applicant constituted a danger to public order.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0517DEC003205596
17 mai 2001
17 mai 2001
The hearing was adjourned because certain authorities had failed to provide the court with documents relating to the financial situation of the defendants.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2716887-2965184
23 avril 2009
23 avril 2009
Summary of the judgment [2] Complaint Relying on Article 6, the applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair because appeal hearings had
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2675
7 juin 2007
7 juin 2007
was still an interest in keeping information confidential when it had already been at least partly made public and was likely to be widely known, having regard to the media coverage of the case, both because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165038
24 juin 2016
24 juin 2016
The Court of Appeal also considered that, in reality, the police had not been actively searching for A.G., because during the relevant time A.G. had taken part in an unrelated court hearing in Lithuania
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162397
30 mars 2016
30 mars 2016
He asked for an extension of the time-limit for appeal, claiming that it had been missed because the applicant had not been represented at the time and had insufficient command of Russian to understand
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219625
7 septembre 2022
7 septembre 2022
On 21 October 2014 a new criminal case, no. 90154014, was opened because the person responsible for the applicant’s frontal injury had not been identified.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221914
22 novembre 2022
22 novembre 2022
Starting with him, because what he does is a big problem...” Afterwards a pre-trial investigation under Article 170 § 2 of the Criminal Code (incitement to hatred) was opened.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242678
12 mars 2025
12 mars 2025
The remaining (sixth) applicant, who had a job in Russia which she had to quit because of the border closures, complains of a breach of her right to respect for her private life.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230903
11 janvier 2024
11 janvier 2024
They held, firstly, that the applicant’s right to protection of his private life could be restricted because during the pre-trial investigation data had been gathered in order to investigate crimes.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157475
1 septembre 2015
1 septembre 2015
On 31 October 2014 because she experienced some complications in respect of her pregnancy, the applicant went to the hospital for medical investigations which confirmed the complications and recommended
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176041
11 juillet 2017
11 juillet 2017
They alleged that the only reason the police had wanted to expel them from the Guba District had been because they had been dressed in traditional Islamic clothes and had long beards.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1276
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
Italy - 39128/05 Judgment 20.10.2009 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Refusal of a teaching post in a denominational university because of alleged heterodox views: violation &
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138913
4 novembre 2013
4 novembre 2013
Because of the cracks in the door and windows, there was constant draught. The toilet was separated with a 80-centimetre high partition from the living area of the cell.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147145
17 septembre 2014
17 septembre 2014
The applicants signed because they did not want to be beaten again. They were released immediately.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4816
12 juin 2003
12 juin 2003
According to the guardianship court, it was necessary to order the applicant’s internment because he refused treatment and thus represented a danger to his own health and to public safety.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0905DEC003866397
5 septembre 2002
5 septembre 2002
A further hearing, listed for 21 September 1993, was adjourned because the judge rapporteur was ill.
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2003:351
17 juin 2003
17 juin 2003
. # Richtlijn 77/187/EEG - Behoud van rechten van werknemers bij overgang van ondernemingen, vestigingen of onderdelen daarvan - Vervroegd pensioen en aanvullende uitkeringen. # Zaak C-4/01.
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:1987:391
29 septembre 1987
29 septembre 1987
. # Terugvordering van het onverschuldigd betaalde - Bewijs dat belastingen niet in de prijs van produkten zijn doorberekend. # Gevoegde zaken 331/85, 376/85 en 378/85.
Source officiellePage 95 sur 1597