CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000445510
27 mai 2014
The actions of the accused, in view of the time and place of the events in issue, were closely connected with the aggression, armed rebellion and armed conflicts in Croatia, and were carried out during
Page 96 sur 131
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD004337402
21 octobre 2010
On 26 August 2003 the additional investigations were completed and on the following day the applicant and his lawyer were given access to the case file. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD003940503
24 avril 2008
On 24 March 2006 the enforcement proceedings were resumed. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0127JUD003958204
27 janvier 2011
He is disabled (his feet were partly amputated in 2001) and walks with a stick. 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC005433710
20 septembre 2011
Subsequently, the latter proceedings were discontinued, pending the outcome of the first proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC007402201
21 octobre 2008
These members were thus obliged to pay considerable sums in cash, with no receipts, as supplementary contributions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000406304
19 février 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003262606
3 février 2011
The applicants were born in 1943, 1964 and 1953 respectively and live in Sofia. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0507JUD002466003
7 mai 2009
The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC003797205
3 février 2009
Upon the applicant’s objection lodged with the assistance of his lawyer at the time, main proceedings were instituted before the District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD002057805
17 janvier 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC007539016
17 décembre 2020
The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD000753105
16 juillet 2015
In 2001 the applicant obtained an award of remuneration arrears in the proceedings against a private company that went under insolvency administration.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD001034107
13 décembre 2016
They were eventually held on 7 February 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD005135510
10 octobre 2013
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.
Cour d'Appel
6253ccb4bd3db21cbdd9102c
27 janvier 2014
APPELANT LE CENTRE DE GESTION ET D'ETUDES AGS (CGEA) DE FORT DE FRANCE Lotissement Dillon Stade 10 rue des Arts et Métiers 97200 FORT DE FRANCE Représenté par Me Isabellel WERTER-FILLOIS (TOQUE 8
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD002767203
15 juillet 2010
The decisions to extend the applicant's detention were taken by prosecutors, who were a party to the proceedings, and who cannot, in principle, be regarded as “independent officers authorised by law to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC003500005
1 avril 2008
The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1015JUD002235806
15 octobre 2009
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC000741903
24 novembre 2009
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice.