CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC003584897
7 septembre 1999
  France judgment of 23   November   1993, Series   A no.   277-B, p.   48, §   32).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602JUD003693605
2 juin 2009
Scott, a lawyer practising at Langleys Solicitors in York. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC007225001
3 mai 2005
a.m. he had gone out to look for his daughter and discovered her having sex with a man; he had taken a log and hit the man in the head; he had not been able to hide the body immediately because his scooter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC001454115
8 janvier 2019
Scots law insists that there must be corroboration, that is to say separate evidence from some other independent credible and reliable source which confirms or supports the principal source of evidence
6ème Chambre
DTA_1907388_20221212
12 décembre 2022
généralement sur son impact environnemental ; - la mise en compatibilité du document local d'urbanisme approuvée par la délibération contestée est incompatible avec le schéma de cohérence territoriale (SCoT
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003510906
18 octobre 2011
France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR   1999-II). 87.
1ère Chambre
DTA_2002466_20230502
2 mai 2023
Par ailleurs, et en tout état de cause, en indiquant dans ses conclusions que " à la suite de l'approbation de la modification du SCOT du Pays de Brest, intégrant les dispositions de la loi ELAN, le PLUi
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1126JUD001316687
26 novembre 1991
bugged" all diplomatic conferences at Lancaster House in London throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s, as well as the Zimbabwe independence negotiations in 1979; (b)    MI5 "bugged" diplomats from France
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002495294
11 janvier 2001
France judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 850, § 50). 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0220JUD005027299
20 février 2003
continued detention of a restricted patient in a hospital where this was necessary on the grounds of public safety, whether or not the mental disorder was treatable (see A. v. the Scottish Ministers , 2001 Scots
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1005DEC001358588
5 octobre 1989
          (ii)   MI5 "bugged" diplomats from France, Germany, Greece and Indonesia, as well as the hotel suite of Mr.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0227JUD006555901
27 février 2007
France judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 850, § 50).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003364496
31 août 1999
  The court stated that the investigation authorities had not yet been provided with a report of the Czech Commercial Bank or with a statement of a witness in France, taken by French judicial authorities
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0215JUD005593900
15 février 2005
The complexity and special characteristics of the investigation are factors to be considered in this respect (see, for example, Scott v.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0712REP001358588
12 juillet 1990
5ème chambre (formation à 3)
DCA_22BX00887_20241210
10 décembre 2024
La société Lafarge Granulats France devenue LafargeHolcim Granulats, exploite depuis 2003 sur le territoire des communes de Montpouillan et de Gaujac (Lot-et-Garonne) une carrière de sable et de graviers
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD007552201
6 novembre 2008
the existence of strong suspicion of the involvement of a person in serious offences, while constituting a relevant factor, cannot alone justify a long period of pre-trial detention (see, inter alia , Scott
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1126JUD001358588
(a) MI5 "bugged" all diplomatic conferences at Lancaster House in London throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s, as well as the Zimbabwe independence negotiations in 1979; (b) MI5 "bugged" diplomats from France
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1028JUD004932711
28 octobre 2014
    The leading case as to what constitutes a breach of the peace under Scots law is Smith v. Donnelly 2001 SLT 1007, where the Appeal Court said: “17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0401DEC005035799
1 avril 2004
Article 35 § 1 refers to “the final decision” taken in the process of exhausting domestic remedies which are “effective and sufficient” for the purpose of redressing the applicant's complaint (see Scotts
Page 96 sur 97
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.