and the Convention; it thus could not be said that the judgment of the Administrative Court had not been amenable to review before the Constitutional Court.

the Civil Court of Appeal.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

    The Court notes that it could be accepted that in the circumstances of the present case, given that the only window of the applicants’ apartment faces the waste collection room entrance,

    On 24 November 1998 the Court of Cassation held a hearing and upheld the judgment of the first-instance court. II.     THE RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 10.

    On 7 October 2011 the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal (“the Court of Appeal”) quashed the above-mentioned ruling and sent the case to the District Court for reconsideration.

    On 7 October 2003 the enforcement proceedings were suspended due to the institution of compulsory settlement proceedings before the Belgrade Commercial Court (“the Commercial Court”).

Indeed, the aforementioned final judgment was set aside three years after it became binding, on the ground that the Frunzenskiy District Court and the Saratov Regional Court had incorrectly applied the

The expert concluded that the applicant could not understand or control her actions. 9.     On 15 May 2009 the Kotovsk Town Court deprived the applicant of her legal capacity.

Monsieur X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 4 février 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire de Mouy à sa demande de copie

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

    The Court reiterates that the execution of a judgment given by any court must be regarded as an integral part of a “hearing” for the purposes of Article   6.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

courts had ordered the State Pension Fund to recalculate his pension, they argued that the applicant could not have claimed any compensation in the absence of a previous judicial decision ordering the

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

court. 26.

Court in Majdanpek I. 78⁄02 of 27⁄02⁄2002.