CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 13 juillet 1990

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                        Application No. 16600/90                       by S., R. W. and N.K.                       against the Netherlands             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 13 July 1990, the following members being present:                 MM. J.A. FROWEIN, Acting President                   S. TRECHSEL                   F. ERMACORA                   G. SPERDUTI                   A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                   A. WEITZEL                   J.-C. SOYER                   H.G. SCHERMERS                   H. DANELIUS              Mrs.   G. H. THUNE              Sir   Basil HALL              Mr.   F. MARTINEZ RUIZ              Mrs.   J. LIDDY              MM.   L. LOUCAIDES                   J.-C. GEUS                   A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO                Mr.   J. RAYMOND, Deputy Secretary to the Commission           Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;           Having regard to the application introduced on 9 May 1990 by S., R. W. and N.K. against the Netherlands and registered on 16 May 1990 under file No. 16600/90;           Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;           Having deliberated;           Decides as follows:           The applicants are a husband and wife and their child, born in 1953, 1962 and 1987 respectively.   The husband is an Israeli national of Palestinian origin and the wife is a Dutch national.   They are both students and the wife also teaches part-time.   Before the Commission they are represented by Mr.   L.C. Baars, a lawyer practising in Schiedam, the Netherlands.           The applicants complained that, following his conviction for the murder of his first wife in 1982, the first applicant was issued an exclusion order.   He had met the second applicant while waiting for his appeals against the exclusion order and now he faced a risk of expulsion to Israel.   The applicants submitted that the wife and child could not be expected to follow the husband to Israel, and his expulsion would infringe their right to respect for their family life.   They invoked Article 8 of the Convention.           On 18 May 1990 the Commission decided not to make an indication under Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure to the respondent Government, that the first applicant not be expelled pending the Commission's examination of the case.           By letter of 2 July 1990 the applicants' representative informed the Commission that the exclusion order against the first applicant had been revoked and he had been granted a residence permit.   Therefore, the applicants wish to withdraw their application before the Commission.           Having regard to Article 30 para. 1 (a) of the Convention, the Commission notes that the applicants do not intend to pursue this petition.   It finds no special circumstances regarding respect for Human Rights as defined in the Convention which require the continuation of the examination of the application, in accordance with Article 30 para. 1 in fine of the Convention.           For these reasons, the Commission           DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES     Deputy Secretary to the Commission     Acting President of the Commission             (J. RAYMOND)                           (J.A. FROWEIN)