CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG — 11 octobre 1990

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                       AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF                         Application No. 13819/88                       by Elli and Airi ALANIVA                       against Sweden             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 11 October 1990 the following members being present:                 MM. C. A. NØRGAARD, President                   J. A. FROWEIN                   S. TRECHSEL                   F. ERMACORA                   G. SPERDUTI                   E. BUSUTTIL                   G. JÖRUNDSSON                   A. S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                   A. WEITZEL                   J. C. SOYER                   H. G. SCHERMERS                   H. DANELIUS              Mrs.   G. H. THUNE              Sir   Basil HALL              Mr.   F. MARTINEZ              Mr.   C.L. ROZAKIS              Mrs.   J. LIDDY              MM.   L. LOUCAIDES                   J.-C. GEUS                   A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO                   M.P. PELLONPÄÄ                Mr.   H. C. KRÜGER Secretary to the Commission           Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;           Having regard to the application introduced on 29 April 1987 by Elli and Airi ALANIVA against Sweden and registered on 2 May 1988 under file No. 13819/88;           Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;           Having deliberated;           Decides as follows:           The applicants, mother and daughter, were born in 1936 and 1960 respectively.   The mother is a Finnish citizen and the daughter is a Swedish citizen.   They reside in Västerås.           Before the Commission the applicants complain of the manner in which the Social Insurance Offices (allmänna försäkringskassorna) in the County of Västmanland and the County of Stockholm have dealt with the applicants' case concerning advance maintenance payment (bidragsförskott) and the recovery of maintenance allowance (underhållsbidrag) in Finland.           The applicants allege violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 13 (P1-1, Art. 13) of the Convention. The final decision is a decision of 11 November 1986 whereby the Supreme Administrative Court (regeringsrätten) in re-opening proceedings (resning) refused to examine the applicants' case further.           The Commission has examined the applicants' separate complaints as they have been submitted by them.   However, after considering the case as a whole, the Commission finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms invoked by the applicants.           It follows that the application is as a whole manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.             For these reasons, the Commission unanimously           DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE     Secretary to the Commission               President of the Commission           (H.C. Krüger)                            (C.A. Nørgaard)