CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG — 7 novembre 1990

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                          AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF                         Application No. 15221/89                       by Jozsef GAMPEL                       against Austria             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 7 November 1990, the following members being present:                 MM. C.A. NØRGAARD, President                   J.A. FROWEIN                   S. TRECHSEL                   F. ERMACORA                   E. BUSUTTIL                   G. JÖRUNDSSON                   A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                   A. WEITZEL                   J.-C. SOYER                   H.G. SCHERMERS                   H. DANELIUS              Mrs.   G. H. THUNE              Sir   Basil HALL              MM.   F. MARTINEZ RUIZ                   C.L. ROZAKIS              Mrs.   J. LIDDY              MM.   L. LOUCAIDES                   J.-C. GEUS                   A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO                   M.P. PELLONPÄÄ                Mr.   H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission           Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;           Having regard to the application introduced on 7 July 1989 by Jozsef GAMPEL against Austria and registered on 20 July 1989 under file No. 15221/89;           Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;           Having deliberated;           Decides as follows:           The applicant is a Hungarian citizen born in 1934.           The applicant was ordered to leave Austria on 12 October 1983 as he had no residence papers, the order to be effective only from 30 April 1984.   The suspensive effect was extended.   Subsequent requests for residence papers and asylum have all been rejected.   A decision of the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) of 1 June 1988 rejected procedural complaints of the applicant.   A further decision of the Constitutional Court, of 17 April 1989, rejected an appeal by the applicant against a decision of the Ministry of the Interior of 14 December 1988, because he had not supplied the requisite copies.           The applicant complains that he was refused a residence and work permit.   He also makes procedural complaints concerning the various proceedings that he has been involved in.   He alleges violations of Articles 5, 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4.           The Commission has examined the applicant's separate complaints as they have been submitted by him.   However, after considering the case as a whole, the Commission finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention.           It follows that the application is inadmissible within the meaning of Article 27 of the Convention.           For these reasons, the Commission unanimously           DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE.     Secretary to the Commission              President of the Commission          (H.C. KRÜGER)                             (C.A. NØRGAARD)